| 1 | |
| 2 | #include <linux/percpu.h>
|
| 3 | #include <linux/sched.h>
|
| 4 | #include <linux/osq_lock.h>
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 | |
| 7 | * An MCS like lock especially tailored for optimistic spinning for sleeping
|
| 8 | * lock implementations (mutex, rwsem, etc).
|
| 9 | *
|
| 10 | * Using a single mcs node per CPU is safe because sleeping locks should not be
|
| 11 | * called from interrupt context and we have preemption disabled while
|
| 12 | * spinning.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 | struct optimistic_spin_node {
|
| 16 | struct optimistic_spin_node *next, *prev;
|
| 17 | int locked;
|
| 18 | int cpu;
|
| 19 | };
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 | static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_node, osq_node);
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 | |
| 24 | * We use the value 0 to represent "no CPU", thus the encoded value
|
| 25 | * will be the CPU number incremented by 1.
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 | static inline int encode_cpu(int cpu_nr)
|
| 28 | {
|
| 29 | return cpu_nr + 1;
|
| 30 | }
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 | static inline int node_cpu(struct optimistic_spin_node *node)
|
| 33 | {
|
| 34 | return node->cpu - 1;
|
| 35 | }
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 | static inline struct optimistic_spin_node *decode_cpu(int encoded_cpu_val)
|
| 38 | {
|
| 39 | int cpu_nr = encoded_cpu_val - 1;
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 | return per_cpu_ptr(&osq_node, cpu_nr);
|
| 42 | }
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 | |
| 45 | * Get a stable @node->next pointer, either for unlock() or unqueue() purposes.
|
| 46 | * Can return NULL in case we were the last queued and we updated @lock instead.
|
| 47 | *
|
| 48 | * If osq_lock() is being cancelled there must be a previous node
|
| 49 | * and 'old_cpu' is its CPU #.
|
| 50 | * For osq_unlock() there is never a previous node and old_cpu is
|
| 51 | * set to OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL.
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 | static inline struct optimistic_spin_node *
|
| 54 | osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
|
| 55 | struct optimistic_spin_node *node,
|
| 56 | int old_cpu)
|
| 57 | {
|
| 58 | int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 | for (;;) {
|
| 61 | if (atomic_read(&lock->tail) == curr &&
|
| 62 | atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->tail, curr, old_cpu) == curr) {
|
| 63 | |
| 64 | * We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev
|
| 65 | * will now observe @lock and will complete its
|
| 66 | * unlock()/unqueue().
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 | return NULL;
|
| 69 | }
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 | |
| 72 | * We must xchg() the @node->next value, because if we were to
|
| 73 | * leave it in, a concurrent unlock()/unqueue() from
|
| 74 | * @node->next might complete Step-A and think its @prev is
|
| 75 | * still valid.
|
| 76 | *
|
| 77 | * If the concurrent unlock()/unqueue() wins the race, we'll
|
| 78 | * wait for either @lock to point to us, through its Step-B, or
|
| 79 | * wait for a new @node->next from its Step-C.
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 | if (node->next) {
|
| 82 | struct optimistic_spin_node *next;
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 | next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
|
| 85 | if (next)
|
| 86 | return next;
|
| 87 | }
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 | cpu_relax();
|
| 90 | }
|
| 91 | }
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 | bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
|
| 94 | {
|
| 95 | struct optimistic_spin_node *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
|
| 96 | struct optimistic_spin_node *prev, *next;
|
| 97 | int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
|
| 98 | int old;
|
| 99 |
|
| 100 | node->locked = 0;
|
| 101 | node->next = NULL;
|
| 102 | node->cpu = curr;
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 | |
| 105 | * We need both ACQUIRE (pairs with corresponding RELEASE in
|
| 106 | * unlock() uncontended, or fastpath) and RELEASE (to publish
|
| 107 | * the node fields we just initialised) semantics when updating
|
| 108 | * the lock tail.
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 | old = atomic_xchg(&lock->tail, curr);
|
| 111 | if (old == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL)
|
| 112 | return true;
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 | prev = decode_cpu(old);
|
| 115 | node->prev = prev;
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 | |
| 118 | * osq_lock() unqueue
|
| 119 | *
|
| 120 | * node->prev = prev osq_wait_next()
|
| 121 | * WMB MB
|
| 122 | * prev->next = node next->prev = prev // unqueue-C
|
| 123 | *
|
| 124 | * Here 'node->prev' and 'next->prev' are the same variable and we need
|
| 125 | * to ensure these stores happen in-order to avoid corrupting the list.
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 | smp_wmb();
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 | WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 | |
| 132 | * Normally @prev is untouchable after the above store; because at that
|
| 133 | * moment unlock can proceed and wipe the node element from stack.
|
| 134 | *
|
| 135 | * However, since our nodes are static per-cpu storage, we're
|
| 136 | * guaranteed their existence -- this allows us to apply
|
| 137 | * cmpxchg in an attempt to undo our queueing.
|
| 138 |
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 | |
| 141 | * Wait to acquire the lock or cancellation. Note that need_resched()
|
| 142 | * will come with an IPI, which will wake smp_cond_load_relaxed() if it
|
| 143 | * is implemented with a monitor-wait. vcpu_is_preempted() relies on
|
| 144 | * polling, be careful.
|
| 145 |
|
| 146 | if (smp_cond_load_relaxed(&node->locked, VAL || need_resched() ||
|
| 147 | vcpu_is_preempted(node_cpu(node->prev))))
|
| 148 | return true;
|
| 149 |
|
| 150 |
|
| 151 | |
| 152 | * Step - A -- stabilize @prev
|
| 153 | *
|
| 154 | * Undo our @prev->next assignment; this will make @prev's
|
| 155 | * unlock()/unqueue() wait for a next pointer since @lock points to us
|
| 156 | * (or later).
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 | for (;;) {
|
| 160 | |
| 161 | * cpu_relax() below implies a compiler barrier which would
|
| 162 | * prevent this comparison being optimized away.
|
| 163 |
|
| 164 | if (data_race(prev->next) == node &&
|
| 165 | cmpxchg(&prev->next, node, NULL) == node)
|
| 166 | break;
|
| 167 |
|
| 168 | |
| 169 | * We can only fail the cmpxchg() racing against an unlock(),
|
| 170 | * in which case we should observe @node->locked becoming
|
| 171 | * true.
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 | if (smp_load_acquire(&node->locked))
|
| 174 | return true;
|
| 175 |
|
| 176 | cpu_relax();
|
| 177 |
|
| 178 | |
| 179 | * Or we race against a concurrent unqueue()'s step-B, in which
|
| 180 | * case its step-C will write us a new @node->prev pointer.
|
| 181 |
|
| 182 | prev = READ_ONCE(node->prev);
|
| 183 | }
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 | |
| 186 | * Step - B -- stabilize @next
|
| 187 | *
|
| 188 | * Similar to unlock(), wait for @node->next or move @lock from @node
|
| 189 | * back to @prev.
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 |
|
| 192 | next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, prev->cpu);
|
| 193 | if (!next)
|
| 194 | return false;
|
| 195 |
|
| 196 | |
| 197 | * Step - C -- unlink
|
| 198 | *
|
| 199 | * @prev is stable because its still waiting for a new @prev->next
|
| 200 | * pointer, @next is stable because our @node->next pointer is NULL and
|
| 201 | * it will wait in Step-A.
|
| 202 |
|
| 203 |
|
| 204 | WRITE_ONCE(next->prev, prev);
|
| 205 | WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, next);
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 | return false;
|
| 208 | }
|
| 209 |
|
| 210 | void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
|
| 211 | {
|
| 212 | struct optimistic_spin_node *node, *next;
|
| 213 | int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id());
|
| 214 |
|
| 215 | |
| 216 | * Fast path for the uncontended case.
|
| 217 |
|
| 218 | if (atomic_try_cmpxchg_release(&lock->tail, &curr, OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL))
|
| 219 | return;
|
| 220 |
|
| 221 | |
| 222 | * Second most likely case.
|
| 223 |
|
| 224 | node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
|
| 225 | next = xchg(&node->next, NULL);
|
| 226 | if (next) {
|
| 227 | WRITE_ONCE(next->locked, 1);
|
| 228 | return;
|
| 229 | }
|
| 230 |
|
| 231 | next = osq_wait_next(lock, node, OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL);
|
| 232 | if (next)
|
| 233 | WRITE_ONCE(next->locked, 1);
|
| 234 | }
|