| 1 | |
| 2 | * RT-Mutexes: simple blocking mutual exclusion locks with PI support
|
| 3 | *
|
| 4 | * started by Ingo Molnar and Thomas Gleixner.
|
| 5 | *
|
| 6 | * Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
| 7 | * Copyright (C) 2005-2006 Timesys Corp., Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
|
| 8 | * Copyright (C) 2005 Kihon Technologies Inc., Steven Rostedt
|
| 9 | * Copyright (C) 2006 Esben Nielsen
|
| 10 | *
|
| 11 | * See Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt for details.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 | #include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
| 14 | #include <linux/export.h>
|
| 15 | #include <linux/sched.h>
|
| 16 | #include <linux/sched/rt.h>
|
| 17 | #include <linux/sched/deadline.h>
|
| 18 | #include <linux/timer.h>
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 | #include "rtmutex_common.h"
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 | |
| 23 | * lock->owner state tracking:
|
| 24 | *
|
| 25 | * lock->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0
|
| 26 | * is used to keep track of the "lock has waiters" state.
|
| 27 | *
|
| 28 | * owner bit0
|
| 29 | * NULL 0 lock is free (fast acquire possible)
|
| 30 | * NULL 1 lock is free and has waiters and the top waiter
|
| 31 | * is going to take the lock*
|
| 32 | * taskpointer 0 lock is held (fast release possible)
|
| 33 | * taskpointer 1 lock is held and has waiters**
|
| 34 | *
|
| 35 | * The fast atomic compare exchange based acquire and release is only
|
| 36 | * possible when bit 0 of lock->owner is 0.
|
| 37 | *
|
| 38 | * (*) It also can be a transitional state when grabbing the lock
|
| 39 | * with ->wait_lock is held. To prevent any fast path cmpxchg to the lock,
|
| 40 | * we need to set the bit0 before looking at the lock, and the owner may be
|
| 41 | * NULL in this small time, hence this can be a transitional state.
|
| 42 | *
|
| 43 | * (**) There is a small time when bit 0 is set but there are no
|
| 44 | * waiters. This can happen when grabbing the lock in the slow path.
|
| 45 | * To prevent a cmpxchg of the owner releasing the lock, we need to
|
| 46 | * set this bit before looking at the lock.
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 | static void
|
| 50 | rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
|
| 51 | {
|
| 52 | unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner;
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 55 | val |= RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS;
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)val;
|
| 58 | }
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 | static inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 61 | {
|
| 62 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)
|
| 63 | ((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
|
| 64 | }
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 | static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 67 | {
|
| 68 | if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 69 | clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 70 | }
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 | |
| 73 | * We can speed up the acquire/release, if the architecture
|
| 74 | * supports cmpxchg and if there's no debugging state to be set up
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 | #if defined(__HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG) && !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES)
|
| 77 | # define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (cmpxchg(&l->owner, c, n) == c)
|
| 78 | static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 79 | {
|
| 80 | unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner;
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 | do {
|
| 83 | owner = *p;
|
| 84 | } while (cmpxchg(p, owner, owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner);
|
| 85 | }
|
| 86 | #else
|
| 87 | # define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (0)
|
| 88 | static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 89 | {
|
| 90 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)
|
| 91 | ((unsigned long)lock->owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
|
| 92 | }
|
| 93 | #endif
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 | static inline int
|
| 96 | rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
|
| 97 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *right)
|
| 98 | {
|
| 99 | if (left->prio < right->prio)
|
| 100 | return 1;
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 | |
| 103 | * If both waiters have dl_prio(), we check the deadlines of the
|
| 104 | * associated tasks.
|
| 105 | * If left waiter has a dl_prio(), and we didn't return 1 above,
|
| 106 | * then right waiter has a dl_prio() too.
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 | if (dl_prio(left->prio))
|
| 109 | return (left->task->dl.deadline < right->task->dl.deadline);
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 | return 0;
|
| 112 | }
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 | static void
|
| 115 | rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 116 | {
|
| 117 | struct rb_node **link = &lock->waiters.rb_node;
|
| 118 | struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
|
| 119 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry;
|
| 120 | int leftmost = 1;
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 | while (*link) {
|
| 123 | parent = *link;
|
| 124 | entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry);
|
| 125 | if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) {
|
| 126 | link = &parent->rb_left;
|
| 127 | } else {
|
| 128 | link = &parent->rb_right;
|
| 129 | leftmost = 0;
|
| 130 | }
|
| 131 | }
|
| 132 |
|
| 133 | if (leftmost)
|
| 134 | lock->waiters_leftmost = &waiter->tree_entry;
|
| 135 |
|
| 136 | rb_link_node(&waiter->tree_entry, parent, link);
|
| 137 | rb_insert_color(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
|
| 138 | }
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 | static void
|
| 141 | rt_mutex_dequeue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 142 | {
|
| 143 | if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry))
|
| 144 | return;
|
| 145 |
|
| 146 | if (lock->waiters_leftmost == &waiter->tree_entry)
|
| 147 | lock->waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->tree_entry);
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 | rb_erase(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
|
| 150 | RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry);
|
| 151 | }
|
| 152 |
|
| 153 | static void
|
| 154 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 155 | {
|
| 156 | struct rb_node **link = &task->pi_waiters.rb_node;
|
| 157 | struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
|
| 158 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry;
|
| 159 | int leftmost = 1;
|
| 160 |
|
| 161 | while (*link) {
|
| 162 | parent = *link;
|
| 163 | entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry);
|
| 164 | if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) {
|
| 165 | link = &parent->rb_left;
|
| 166 | } else {
|
| 167 | link = &parent->rb_right;
|
| 168 | leftmost = 0;
|
| 169 | }
|
| 170 | }
|
| 171 |
|
| 172 | if (leftmost)
|
| 173 | task->pi_waiters_leftmost = &waiter->pi_tree_entry;
|
| 174 |
|
| 175 | rb_link_node(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, parent, link);
|
| 176 | rb_insert_color(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
|
| 177 | }
|
| 178 |
|
| 179 | static void
|
| 180 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 181 | {
|
| 182 | if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry))
|
| 183 | return;
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 | if (task->pi_waiters_leftmost == &waiter->pi_tree_entry)
|
| 186 | task->pi_waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 | rb_erase(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
|
| 189 | RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
|
| 190 | }
|
| 191 |
|
| 192 | |
| 193 | * Calculate task priority from the waiter tree priority
|
| 194 | *
|
| 195 | * Return task->normal_prio when the waiter tree is empty or when
|
| 196 | * the waiter is not allowed to do priority boosting
|
| 197 |
|
| 198 | int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task)
|
| 199 | {
|
| 200 | if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task)))
|
| 201 | return task->normal_prio;
|
| 202 |
|
| 203 | return min(task_top_pi_waiter(task)->prio,
|
| 204 | task->normal_prio);
|
| 205 | }
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 | struct task_struct *rt_mutex_get_top_task(struct task_struct *task)
|
| 208 | {
|
| 209 | if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task)))
|
| 210 | return NULL;
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 | return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task;
|
| 213 | }
|
| 214 |
|
| 215 | |
| 216 | * Called by sched_setscheduler() to check whether the priority change
|
| 217 | * is overruled by a possible priority boosting.
|
| 218 |
|
| 219 | int rt_mutex_check_prio(struct task_struct *task, int newprio)
|
| 220 | {
|
| 221 | if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
|
| 222 | return 0;
|
| 223 |
|
| 224 | return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio <= newprio;
|
| 225 | }
|
| 226 |
|
| 227 | |
| 228 | * Adjust the priority of a task, after its pi_waiters got modified.
|
| 229 | *
|
| 230 | * This can be both boosting and unboosting. task->pi_lock must be held.
|
| 231 |
|
| 232 | static void __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
|
| 233 | {
|
| 234 | int prio = rt_mutex_getprio(task);
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 | if (task->prio != prio || dl_prio(prio))
|
| 237 | rt_mutex_setprio(task, prio);
|
| 238 | }
|
| 239 |
|
| 240 | |
| 241 | * Adjust task priority (undo boosting). Called from the exit path of
|
| 242 | * rt_mutex_slowunlock() and rt_mutex_slowlock().
|
| 243 | *
|
| 244 | * (Note: We do this outside of the protection of lock->wait_lock to
|
| 245 | * allow the lock to be taken while or before we readjust the priority
|
| 246 | * of task. We do not use the spin_xx_mutex() variants here as we are
|
| 247 | * outside of the debug path.)
|
| 248 |
|
| 249 | static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
|
| 250 | {
|
| 251 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 252 |
|
| 253 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 254 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
|
| 255 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 256 | }
|
| 257 |
|
| 258 | |
| 259 | * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
|
| 260 |
|
| 261 | int max_lock_depth = 1024;
|
| 262 |
|
| 263 | |
| 264 | * Adjust the priority chain. Also used for deadlock detection.
|
| 265 | * Decreases task's usage by one - may thus free the task.
|
| 266 | *
|
| 267 | * @task: the task owning the mutex (owner) for which a chain walk is probably
|
| 268 | * needed
|
| 269 | * @deadlock_detect: do we have to carry out deadlock detection?
|
| 270 | * @orig_lock: the mutex (can be NULL if we are walking the chain to recheck
|
| 271 | * things for a task that has just got its priority adjusted, and
|
| 272 | * is waiting on a mutex)
|
| 273 | * @orig_waiter: rt_mutex_waiter struct for the task that has just donated
|
| 274 | * its priority to the mutex owner (can be NULL in the case
|
| 275 | * depicted above or if the top waiter is gone away and we are
|
| 276 | * actually deboosting the owner)
|
| 277 | * @top_task: the current top waiter
|
| 278 | *
|
| 279 | * Returns 0 or -EDEADLK.
|
| 280 |
|
| 281 | static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
| 282 | int deadlock_detect,
|
| 283 | struct rt_mutex *orig_lock,
|
| 284 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter,
|
| 285 | struct task_struct *top_task)
|
| 286 | {
|
| 287 | struct rt_mutex *lock;
|
| 288 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter;
|
| 289 | int detect_deadlock, ret = 0, depth = 0;
|
| 290 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 291 |
|
| 292 | detect_deadlock = debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter,
|
| 293 | deadlock_detect);
|
| 294 |
|
| 295 | |
| 296 | * The (de)boosting is a step by step approach with a lot of
|
| 297 | * pitfalls. We want this to be preemptible and we want hold a
|
| 298 | * maximum of two locks per step. So we have to check
|
| 299 | * carefully whether things change under us.
|
| 300 |
|
| 301 | again:
|
| 302 | if (++depth > max_lock_depth) {
|
| 303 | static int prev_max;
|
| 304 |
|
| 305 | |
| 306 | * Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit,
|
| 307 | * print a new message when reaching the limit again.
|
| 308 |
|
| 309 | if (prev_max != max_lock_depth) {
|
| 310 | prev_max = max_lock_depth;
|
| 311 | printk(KERN_WARNING "Maximum lock depth %d reached "
|
| 312 | "task: %s (%d)\n", max_lock_depth,
|
| 313 | top_task->comm, task_pid_nr(top_task));
|
| 314 | }
|
| 315 | put_task_struct(task);
|
| 316 |
|
| 317 | return deadlock_detect ? -EDEADLK : 0;
|
| 318 | }
|
| 319 | retry:
|
| 320 | |
| 321 | * Task can not go away as we did a get_task() before !
|
| 322 |
|
| 323 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 324 |
|
| 325 | waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
|
| 326 | |
| 327 | * Check whether the end of the boosting chain has been
|
| 328 | * reached or the state of the chain has changed while we
|
| 329 | * dropped the locks.
|
| 330 |
|
| 331 | if (!waiter)
|
| 332 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 333 |
|
| 334 | |
| 335 | * Check the orig_waiter state. After we dropped the locks,
|
| 336 | * the previous owner of the lock might have released the lock.
|
| 337 |
|
| 338 | if (orig_waiter && !rt_mutex_owner(orig_lock))
|
| 339 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 340 |
|
| 341 | |
| 342 | * Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note,
|
| 343 | * top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting
|
| 344 | * mode!
|
| 345 |
|
| 346 | if (top_waiter) {
|
| 347 | if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
|
| 348 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 349 | |
| 350 | * If deadlock detection is off, we stop here if we
|
| 351 | * are not the top pi waiter of the task.
|
| 352 |
|
| 353 | if (!detect_deadlock && top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task))
|
| 354 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 355 | }
|
| 356 |
|
| 357 | |
| 358 | * When deadlock detection is off then we check, if further
|
| 359 | * priority adjustment is necessary.
|
| 360 |
|
| 361 | if (!detect_deadlock && waiter->prio == task->prio)
|
| 362 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 363 |
|
| 364 | lock = waiter->lock;
|
| 365 | if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) {
|
| 366 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 367 | cpu_relax();
|
| 368 | goto retry;
|
| 369 | }
|
| 370 |
|
| 371 | |
| 372 | * Deadlock detection. If the lock is the same as the original
|
| 373 | * lock which caused us to walk the lock chain or if the
|
| 374 | * current lock is owned by the task which initiated the chain
|
| 375 | * walk, we detected a deadlock.
|
| 376 |
|
| 377 | if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) {
|
| 378 | debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(deadlock_detect, orig_waiter, lock);
|
| 379 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 380 | ret = deadlock_detect ? -EDEADLK : 0;
|
| 381 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 382 | }
|
| 383 |
|
| 384 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 385 |
|
| 386 |
|
| 387 | rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
| 388 | waiter->prio = task->prio;
|
| 389 | rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
|
| 390 |
|
| 391 |
|
| 392 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 393 | if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
|
| 394 | |
| 395 | * If the requeue above changed the top waiter, then we need
|
| 396 | * to wake the new top waiter up to try to get the lock.
|
| 397 |
|
| 398 |
|
| 399 | if (top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
|
| 400 | wake_up_process(rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task);
|
| 401 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 402 | goto out_put_task;
|
| 403 | }
|
| 404 | put_task_struct(task);
|
| 405 |
|
| 406 |
|
| 407 | task = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
| 408 | get_task_struct(task);
|
| 409 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 410 |
|
| 411 | if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
|
| 412 |
|
| 413 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, top_waiter);
|
| 414 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
|
| 415 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
|
| 416 |
|
| 417 | } else if (top_waiter == waiter) {
|
| 418 |
|
| 419 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
|
| 420 | waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 421 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
|
| 422 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
|
| 423 | }
|
| 424 |
|
| 425 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 426 |
|
| 427 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 428 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 429 |
|
| 430 | if (!detect_deadlock && waiter != top_waiter)
|
| 431 | goto out_put_task;
|
| 432 |
|
| 433 | goto again;
|
| 434 |
|
| 435 | out_unlock_pi:
|
| 436 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 437 | out_put_task:
|
| 438 | put_task_struct(task);
|
| 439 |
|
| 440 | return ret;
|
| 441 | }
|
| 442 |
|
| 443 | |
| 444 | * Try to take an rt-mutex
|
| 445 | *
|
| 446 | * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held.
|
| 447 | *
|
| 448 | * @lock: the lock to be acquired.
|
| 449 | * @task: the task which wants to acquire the lock
|
| 450 | * @waiter: the waiter that is queued to the lock's wait list. (could be NULL)
|
| 451 |
|
| 452 | static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
|
| 453 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 454 | {
|
| 455 | |
| 456 | * We have to be careful here if the atomic speedups are
|
| 457 | * enabled, such that, when
|
| 458 | * - no other waiter is on the lock
|
| 459 | * - the lock has been released since we did the cmpxchg
|
| 460 | * the lock can be released or taken while we are doing the
|
| 461 | * checks and marking the lock with RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS.
|
| 462 | *
|
| 463 | * The atomic acquire/release aware variant of
|
| 464 | * mark_rt_mutex_waiters uses a cmpxchg loop. After setting
|
| 465 | * the WAITERS bit, the atomic release / acquire can not
|
| 466 | * happen anymore and lock->wait_lock protects us from the
|
| 467 | * non-atomic case.
|
| 468 | *
|
| 469 | * Note, that this might set lock->owner =
|
| 470 | * RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS in the case the lock is not contended
|
| 471 | * any more. This is fixed up when we take the ownership.
|
| 472 | * This is the transitional state explained at the top of this file.
|
| 473 |
|
| 474 | mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 475 |
|
| 476 | if (rt_mutex_owner(lock))
|
| 477 | return 0;
|
| 478 |
|
| 479 | |
| 480 | * It will get the lock because of one of these conditions:
|
| 481 | * 1) there is no waiter
|
| 482 | * 2) higher priority than waiters
|
| 483 | * 3) it is top waiter
|
| 484 |
|
| 485 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
|
| 486 | if (task->prio >= rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->prio) {
|
| 487 | if (!waiter || waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
|
| 488 | return 0;
|
| 489 | }
|
| 490 | }
|
| 491 |
|
| 492 | if (waiter || rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
|
| 493 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 494 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *top;
|
| 495 |
|
| 496 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 497 |
|
| 498 |
|
| 499 | if (waiter) {
|
| 500 | rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
| 501 | task->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
|
| 502 | }
|
| 503 |
|
| 504 | |
| 505 | * We have to enqueue the top waiter(if it exists) into
|
| 506 | * task->pi_waiters list.
|
| 507 |
|
| 508 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
|
| 509 | top = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 510 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, top);
|
| 511 | }
|
| 512 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 513 | }
|
| 514 |
|
| 515 |
|
| 516 | debug_rt_mutex_lock(lock);
|
| 517 |
|
| 518 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, task);
|
| 519 |
|
| 520 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, task);
|
| 521 |
|
| 522 | return 1;
|
| 523 | }
|
| 524 |
|
| 525 | |
| 526 | * Task blocks on lock.
|
| 527 | *
|
| 528 | * Prepare waiter and propagate pi chain
|
| 529 | *
|
| 530 | * This must be called with lock->wait_lock held.
|
| 531 |
|
| 532 | static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 533 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
|
| 534 | struct task_struct *task,
|
| 535 | int detect_deadlock)
|
| 536 | {
|
| 537 | struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
| 538 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter;
|
| 539 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 540 | int chain_walk = 0, res;
|
| 541 |
|
| 542 | |
| 543 | * Early deadlock detection. We really don't want the task to
|
| 544 | * enqueue on itself just to untangle the mess later. It's not
|
| 545 | * only an optimization. We drop the locks, so another waiter
|
| 546 | * can come in before the chain walk detects the deadlock. So
|
| 547 | * the other will detect the deadlock and return -EDEADLOCK,
|
| 548 | * which is wrong, as the other waiter is not in a deadlock
|
| 549 | * situation.
|
| 550 |
|
| 551 | if (detect_deadlock && owner == task)
|
| 552 | return -EDEADLK;
|
| 553 |
|
| 554 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 555 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
|
| 556 | waiter->task = task;
|
| 557 | waiter->lock = lock;
|
| 558 | waiter->prio = task->prio;
|
| 559 |
|
| 560 |
|
| 561 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 562 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 563 | rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
|
| 564 |
|
| 565 | task->pi_blocked_on = waiter;
|
| 566 |
|
| 567 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 568 |
|
| 569 | if (!owner)
|
| 570 | return 0;
|
| 571 |
|
| 572 | if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
|
| 573 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 574 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter);
|
| 575 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter);
|
| 576 |
|
| 577 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
|
| 578 | if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
|
| 579 | chain_walk = 1;
|
| 580 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 581 | }
|
| 582 | else if (debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock))
|
| 583 | chain_walk = 1;
|
| 584 |
|
| 585 | if (!chain_walk)
|
| 586 | return 0;
|
| 587 |
|
| 588 | |
| 589 | * The owner can't disappear while holding a lock,
|
| 590 | * so the owner struct is protected by wait_lock.
|
| 591 | * Gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()!
|
| 592 |
|
| 593 | get_task_struct(owner);
|
| 594 |
|
| 595 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 596 |
|
| 597 | res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, detect_deadlock, lock, waiter,
|
| 598 | task);
|
| 599 |
|
| 600 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 601 |
|
| 602 | return res;
|
| 603 | }
|
| 604 |
|
| 605 | |
| 606 | * Wake up the next waiter on the lock.
|
| 607 | *
|
| 608 | * Remove the top waiter from the current tasks waiter list and wake it up.
|
| 609 | *
|
| 610 | * Called with lock->wait_lock held.
|
| 611 |
|
| 612 | static void wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 613 | {
|
| 614 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
|
| 615 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 616 |
|
| 617 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 618 |
|
| 619 | waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 620 |
|
| 621 | |
| 622 | * Remove it from current->pi_waiters. We do not adjust a
|
| 623 | * possible priority boost right now. We execute wakeup in the
|
| 624 | * boosted mode and go back to normal after releasing
|
| 625 | * lock->wait_lock.
|
| 626 |
|
| 627 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter);
|
| 628 |
|
| 629 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
|
| 630 |
|
| 631 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 632 |
|
| 633 | wake_up_process(waiter->task);
|
| 634 | }
|
| 635 |
|
| 636 | |
| 637 | * Remove a waiter from a lock and give up
|
| 638 | *
|
| 639 | * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and
|
| 640 | * have just failed to try_to_take_rt_mutex().
|
| 641 |
|
| 642 | static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 643 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 644 | {
|
| 645 | int first = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
|
| 646 | struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
| 647 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 648 | int chain_walk = 0;
|
| 649 |
|
| 650 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 651 | rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
| 652 | current->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
|
| 653 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 654 |
|
| 655 | if (!owner)
|
| 656 | return;
|
| 657 |
|
| 658 | if (first) {
|
| 659 |
|
| 660 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 661 |
|
| 662 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, waiter);
|
| 663 |
|
| 664 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
|
| 665 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *next;
|
| 666 |
|
| 667 | next = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 668 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, next);
|
| 669 | }
|
| 670 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
|
| 671 |
|
| 672 | if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
|
| 673 | chain_walk = 1;
|
| 674 |
|
| 675 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 676 | }
|
| 677 |
|
| 678 | if (!chain_walk)
|
| 679 | return;
|
| 680 |
|
| 681 |
|
| 682 | get_task_struct(owner);
|
| 683 |
|
| 684 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 685 |
|
| 686 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, 0, lock, NULL, current);
|
| 687 |
|
| 688 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 689 | }
|
| 690 |
|
| 691 | |
| 692 | * Recheck the pi chain, in case we got a priority setting
|
| 693 | *
|
| 694 | * Called from sched_setscheduler
|
| 695 |
|
| 696 | void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
|
| 697 | {
|
| 698 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
|
| 699 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 700 |
|
| 701 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 702 |
|
| 703 | waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
|
| 704 | if (!waiter || (waiter->prio == task->prio &&
|
| 705 | !dl_prio(task->prio))) {
|
| 706 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 707 | return;
|
| 708 | }
|
| 709 |
|
| 710 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 711 |
|
| 712 |
|
| 713 | get_task_struct(task);
|
| 714 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, NULL, task);
|
| 715 | }
|
| 716 |
|
| 717 | |
| 718 | * __rt_mutex_slowlock() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop
|
| 719 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to take
|
| 720 | * @state: the state the task should block in (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
|
| 721 | * or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
|
| 722 | * @timeout: the pre-initialized and started timer, or NULL for none
|
| 723 | * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
|
| 724 | *
|
| 725 | * lock->wait_lock must be held by the caller.
|
| 726 |
|
| 727 | static int __sched
|
| 728 | __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 729 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
|
| 730 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 731 | {
|
| 732 | int ret = 0;
|
| 733 |
|
| 734 | for (;;) {
|
| 735 |
|
| 736 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter))
|
| 737 | break;
|
| 738 |
|
| 739 | |
| 740 | * TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE checks for signals and
|
| 741 | * timeout. Ignored otherwise.
|
| 742 |
|
| 743 | if (unlikely(state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)) {
|
| 744 |
|
| 745 | if (signal_pending(current))
|
| 746 | ret = -EINTR;
|
| 747 | if (timeout && !timeout->task)
|
| 748 | ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
|
| 749 | if (ret)
|
| 750 | break;
|
| 751 | }
|
| 752 |
|
| 753 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 754 |
|
| 755 | debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter);
|
| 756 |
|
| 757 | schedule_rt_mutex(lock);
|
| 758 |
|
| 759 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 760 | set_current_state(state);
|
| 761 | }
|
| 762 |
|
| 763 | return ret;
|
| 764 | }
|
| 765 |
|
| 766 | |
| 767 | * Slow path lock function:
|
| 768 |
|
| 769 | static int __sched
|
| 770 | rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 771 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
|
| 772 | int detect_deadlock)
|
| 773 | {
|
| 774 | struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
|
| 775 | int ret = 0;
|
| 776 |
|
| 777 | debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter);
|
| 778 | RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.pi_tree_entry);
|
| 779 | RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.tree_entry);
|
| 780 |
|
| 781 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 782 |
|
| 783 |
|
| 784 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) {
|
| 785 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 786 | return 0;
|
| 787 | }
|
| 788 |
|
| 789 | set_current_state(state);
|
| 790 |
|
| 791 |
|
| 792 | if (unlikely(timeout)) {
|
| 793 | hrtimer_start_expires(&timeout->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
|
| 794 | if (!hrtimer_active(&timeout->timer))
|
| 795 | timeout->task = NULL;
|
| 796 | }
|
| 797 |
|
| 798 | ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, detect_deadlock);
|
| 799 |
|
| 800 | if (likely(!ret))
|
| 801 | ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter);
|
| 802 |
|
| 803 | set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
| 804 |
|
| 805 | if (unlikely(ret))
|
| 806 | remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
|
| 807 |
|
| 808 | |
| 809 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit
|
| 810 | * unconditionally. We might have to fix that up.
|
| 811 |
|
| 812 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 813 |
|
| 814 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 815 |
|
| 816 |
|
| 817 | if (unlikely(timeout))
|
| 818 | hrtimer_cancel(&timeout->timer);
|
| 819 |
|
| 820 | debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
|
| 821 |
|
| 822 | return ret;
|
| 823 | }
|
| 824 |
|
| 825 | |
| 826 | * Slow path try-lock function:
|
| 827 |
|
| 828 | static inline int
|
| 829 | rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 830 | {
|
| 831 | int ret = 0;
|
| 832 |
|
| 833 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 834 |
|
| 835 | if (likely(rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current)) {
|
| 836 |
|
| 837 | ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL);
|
| 838 | |
| 839 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters
|
| 840 | * bit unconditionally. Clean this up.
|
| 841 |
|
| 842 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 843 | }
|
| 844 |
|
| 845 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 846 |
|
| 847 | return ret;
|
| 848 | }
|
| 849 |
|
| 850 | |
| 851 | * Slow path to release a rt-mutex:
|
| 852 |
|
| 853 | static void __sched
|
| 854 | rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 855 | {
|
| 856 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 857 |
|
| 858 | debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
|
| 859 |
|
| 860 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
|
| 861 |
|
| 862 | if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
|
| 863 | lock->owner = NULL;
|
| 864 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 865 | return;
|
| 866 | }
|
| 867 |
|
| 868 | wakeup_next_waiter(lock);
|
| 869 |
|
| 870 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 871 |
|
| 872 |
|
| 873 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
|
| 874 | }
|
| 875 |
|
| 876 | |
| 877 | * debug aware fast / slowpath lock,trylock,unlock
|
| 878 | *
|
| 879 | * The atomic acquire/release ops are compiled away, when either the
|
| 880 | * architecture does not support cmpxchg or when debugging is enabled.
|
| 881 |
|
| 882 | static inline int
|
| 883 | rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 884 | int detect_deadlock,
|
| 885 | int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 886 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
|
| 887 | int detect_deadlock))
|
| 888 | {
|
| 889 | if (!detect_deadlock && likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
|
| 890 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
|
| 891 | return 0;
|
| 892 | } else
|
| 893 | return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, detect_deadlock);
|
| 894 | }
|
| 895 |
|
| 896 | static inline int
|
| 897 | rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 898 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, int detect_deadlock,
|
| 899 | int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 900 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
|
| 901 | int detect_deadlock))
|
| 902 | {
|
| 903 | if (!detect_deadlock && likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
|
| 904 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
|
| 905 | return 0;
|
| 906 | } else
|
| 907 | return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, detect_deadlock);
|
| 908 | }
|
| 909 |
|
| 910 | static inline int
|
| 911 | rt_mutex_fasttrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 912 | int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock))
|
| 913 | {
|
| 914 | if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
|
| 915 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
|
| 916 | return 1;
|
| 917 | }
|
| 918 | return slowfn(lock);
|
| 919 | }
|
| 920 |
|
| 921 | static inline void
|
| 922 | rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 923 | void (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock))
|
| 924 | {
|
| 925 | if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, current, NULL)))
|
| 926 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
|
| 927 | else
|
| 928 | slowfn(lock);
|
| 929 | }
|
| 930 |
|
| 931 | |
| 932 | * rt_mutex_lock - lock a rt_mutex
|
| 933 | *
|
| 934 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 935 |
|
| 936 | void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 937 | {
|
| 938 | might_sleep();
|
| 939 |
|
| 940 | rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, 0, rt_mutex_slowlock);
|
| 941 | }
|
| 942 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock);
|
| 943 |
|
| 944 | |
| 945 | * rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
|
| 946 | *
|
| 947 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 948 | * @detect_deadlock: deadlock detection on/off
|
| 949 | *
|
| 950 | * Returns:
|
| 951 | * 0 on success
|
| 952 | * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
|
| 953 | * -EDEADLK when the lock would deadlock (when deadlock detection is on)
|
| 954 |
|
| 955 | int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 956 | int detect_deadlock)
|
| 957 | {
|
| 958 | might_sleep();
|
| 959 |
|
| 960 | return rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
|
| 961 | detect_deadlock, rt_mutex_slowlock);
|
| 962 | }
|
| 963 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible);
|
| 964 |
|
| 965 | |
| 966 | * rt_mutex_timed_lock - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
|
| 967 | * the timeout structure is provided
|
| 968 | * by the caller
|
| 969 | *
|
| 970 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 971 | * @timeout: timeout structure or NULL (no timeout)
|
| 972 | * @detect_deadlock: deadlock detection on/off
|
| 973 | *
|
| 974 | * Returns:
|
| 975 | * 0 on success
|
| 976 | * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
|
| 977 | * -ETIMEDOUT when the timeout expired
|
| 978 | * -EDEADLK when the lock would deadlock (when deadlock detection is on)
|
| 979 |
|
| 980 | int
|
| 981 | rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
|
| 982 | int detect_deadlock)
|
| 983 | {
|
| 984 | might_sleep();
|
| 985 |
|
| 986 | return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
|
| 987 | detect_deadlock, rt_mutex_slowlock);
|
| 988 | }
|
| 989 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_timed_lock);
|
| 990 |
|
| 991 | |
| 992 | * rt_mutex_trylock - try to lock a rt_mutex
|
| 993 | *
|
| 994 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 995 | *
|
| 996 | * Returns 1 on success and 0 on contention
|
| 997 |
|
| 998 | int __sched rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 999 | {
|
| 1000 | return rt_mutex_fasttrylock(lock, rt_mutex_slowtrylock);
|
| 1001 | }
|
| 1002 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_trylock);
|
| 1003 |
|
| 1004 | |
| 1005 | * rt_mutex_unlock - unlock a rt_mutex
|
| 1006 | *
|
| 1007 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked
|
| 1008 |
|
| 1009 | void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 1010 | {
|
| 1011 | rt_mutex_fastunlock(lock, rt_mutex_slowunlock);
|
| 1012 | }
|
| 1013 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock);
|
| 1014 |
|
| 1015 | |
| 1016 | * rt_mutex_destroy - mark a mutex unusable
|
| 1017 | * @lock: the mutex to be destroyed
|
| 1018 | *
|
| 1019 | * This function marks the mutex uninitialized, and any subsequent
|
| 1020 | * use of the mutex is forbidden. The mutex must not be locked when
|
| 1021 | * this function is called.
|
| 1022 |
|
| 1023 | void rt_mutex_destroy(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 1024 | {
|
| 1025 | WARN_ON(rt_mutex_is_locked(lock));
|
| 1026 | #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
|
| 1027 | lock->magic = NULL;
|
| 1028 | #endif
|
| 1029 | }
|
| 1030 |
|
| 1031 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_destroy);
|
| 1032 |
|
| 1033 | |
| 1034 | * __rt_mutex_init - initialize the rt lock
|
| 1035 | *
|
| 1036 | * @lock: the rt lock to be initialized
|
| 1037 | *
|
| 1038 | * Initialize the rt lock to unlocked state.
|
| 1039 | *
|
| 1040 | * Initializing of a locked rt lock is not allowed
|
| 1041 |
|
| 1042 | void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name)
|
| 1043 | {
|
| 1044 | lock->owner = NULL;
|
| 1045 | raw_spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1046 | lock->waiters = RB_ROOT;
|
| 1047 | lock->waiters_leftmost = NULL;
|
| 1048 |
|
| 1049 | debug_rt_mutex_init(lock, name);
|
| 1050 | }
|
| 1051 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init);
|
| 1052 |
|
| 1053 | |
| 1054 | * rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked - initialize and lock a rt_mutex on behalf of a
|
| 1055 | * proxy owner
|
| 1056 | *
|
| 1057 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 1058 | * @proxy_owner:the task to set as owner
|
| 1059 | *
|
| 1060 | * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself
|
| 1061 | * Special API call for PI-futex support
|
| 1062 |
|
| 1063 | void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1064 | struct task_struct *proxy_owner)
|
| 1065 | {
|
| 1066 | __rt_mutex_init(lock, NULL);
|
| 1067 | debug_rt_mutex_proxy_lock(lock, proxy_owner);
|
| 1068 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, proxy_owner);
|
| 1069 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, proxy_owner);
|
| 1070 | }
|
| 1071 |
|
| 1072 | |
| 1073 | * rt_mutex_proxy_unlock - release a lock on behalf of owner
|
| 1074 | *
|
| 1075 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 1076 | *
|
| 1077 | * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself
|
| 1078 | * Special API call for PI-futex support
|
| 1079 |
|
| 1080 | void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1081 | struct task_struct *proxy_owner)
|
| 1082 | {
|
| 1083 | debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock);
|
| 1084 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
|
| 1085 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(proxy_owner);
|
| 1086 | }
|
| 1087 |
|
| 1088 | |
| 1089 | * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
|
| 1090 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to take
|
| 1091 | * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
|
| 1092 | * @task: the task to prepare
|
| 1093 | * @detect_deadlock: perform deadlock detection (1) or not (0)
|
| 1094 | *
|
| 1095 | * Returns:
|
| 1096 | * 0 - task blocked on lock
|
| 1097 | * 1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
|
| 1098 | * <0 - error
|
| 1099 | *
|
| 1100 | * Special API call for FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI support.
|
| 1101 |
|
| 1102 | int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1103 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
|
| 1104 | struct task_struct *task, int detect_deadlock)
|
| 1105 | {
|
| 1106 | int ret;
|
| 1107 |
|
| 1108 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1109 |
|
| 1110 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL)) {
|
| 1111 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1112 | return 1;
|
| 1113 | }
|
| 1114 |
|
| 1115 | ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock);
|
| 1116 |
|
| 1117 | if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
|
| 1118 | |
| 1119 | * Reset the return value. We might have
|
| 1120 | * returned with -EDEADLK and the owner
|
| 1121 | * released the lock while we were walking the
|
| 1122 | * pi chain. Let the waiter sort it out.
|
| 1123 |
|
| 1124 | ret = 0;
|
| 1125 | }
|
| 1126 |
|
| 1127 | if (unlikely(ret))
|
| 1128 | remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
|
| 1129 |
|
| 1130 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1131 |
|
| 1132 | debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter);
|
| 1133 |
|
| 1134 | return ret;
|
| 1135 | }
|
| 1136 |
|
| 1137 | |
| 1138 | * rt_mutex_next_owner - return the next owner of the lock
|
| 1139 | *
|
| 1140 | * @lock: the rt lock query
|
| 1141 | *
|
| 1142 | * Returns the next owner of the lock or NULL
|
| 1143 | *
|
| 1144 | * Caller has to serialize against other accessors to the lock
|
| 1145 | * itself.
|
| 1146 | *
|
| 1147 | * Special API call for PI-futex support
|
| 1148 |
|
| 1149 | struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 1150 | {
|
| 1151 | if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 1152 | return NULL;
|
| 1153 |
|
| 1154 | return rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task;
|
| 1155 | }
|
| 1156 |
|
| 1157 | |
| 1158 | * rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() - Complete lock acquisition
|
| 1159 | * @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on
|
| 1160 | * @to: the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have
|
| 1161 | * been started.
|
| 1162 | * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
|
| 1163 | * @detect_deadlock: perform deadlock detection (1) or not (0)
|
| 1164 | *
|
| 1165 | * Complete the lock acquisition started our behalf by another thread.
|
| 1166 | *
|
| 1167 | * Returns:
|
| 1168 | * 0 - success
|
| 1169 | * <0 - error, one of -EINTR, -ETIMEDOUT, or -EDEADLK
|
| 1170 | *
|
| 1171 | * Special API call for PI-futex requeue support
|
| 1172 |
|
| 1173 | int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1174 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
|
| 1175 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
|
| 1176 | int detect_deadlock)
|
| 1177 | {
|
| 1178 | int ret;
|
| 1179 |
|
| 1180 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1181 |
|
| 1182 | set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
| 1183 |
|
| 1184 | ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
|
| 1185 |
|
| 1186 | set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
| 1187 |
|
| 1188 | if (unlikely(ret))
|
| 1189 | remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
|
| 1190 |
|
| 1191 | |
| 1192 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
|
| 1193 | * have to fix that up.
|
| 1194 |
|
| 1195 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 1196 |
|
| 1197 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1198 |
|
| 1199 | return ret;
|
| 1200 | }
|