| 1 | |
| 2 | * RT-Mutexes: simple blocking mutual exclusion locks with PI support
|
| 3 | *
|
| 4 | * started by Ingo Molnar and Thomas Gleixner.
|
| 5 | *
|
| 6 | * Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
| 7 | * Copyright (C) 2005-2006 Timesys Corp., Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
|
| 8 | * Copyright (C) 2005 Kihon Technologies Inc., Steven Rostedt
|
| 9 | * Copyright (C) 2006 Esben Nielsen
|
| 10 | *
|
| 11 | * See Documentation/locking/rt-mutex-design.txt for details.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 | #include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
| 14 | #include <linux/export.h>
|
| 15 | #include <linux/sched.h>
|
| 16 | #include <linux/sched/rt.h>
|
| 17 | #include <linux/sched/deadline.h>
|
| 18 | #include <linux/timer.h>
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 | #include "rtmutex_common.h"
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 | |
| 23 | * lock->owner state tracking:
|
| 24 | *
|
| 25 | * lock->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0
|
| 26 | * is used to keep track of the "lock has waiters" state.
|
| 27 | *
|
| 28 | * owner bit0
|
| 29 | * NULL 0 lock is free (fast acquire possible)
|
| 30 | * NULL 1 lock is free and has waiters and the top waiter
|
| 31 | * is going to take the lock*
|
| 32 | * taskpointer 0 lock is held (fast release possible)
|
| 33 | * taskpointer 1 lock is held and has waiters**
|
| 34 | *
|
| 35 | * The fast atomic compare exchange based acquire and release is only
|
| 36 | * possible when bit 0 of lock->owner is 0.
|
| 37 | *
|
| 38 | * (*) It also can be a transitional state when grabbing the lock
|
| 39 | * with ->wait_lock is held. To prevent any fast path cmpxchg to the lock,
|
| 40 | * we need to set the bit0 before looking at the lock, and the owner may be
|
| 41 | * NULL in this small time, hence this can be a transitional state.
|
| 42 | *
|
| 43 | * (**) There is a small time when bit 0 is set but there are no
|
| 44 | * waiters. This can happen when grabbing the lock in the slow path.
|
| 45 | * To prevent a cmpxchg of the owner releasing the lock, we need to
|
| 46 | * set this bit before looking at the lock.
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 | static void
|
| 50 | rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
|
| 51 | {
|
| 52 | unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner;
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 55 | val |= RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS;
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)val;
|
| 58 | }
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 | static inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 61 | {
|
| 62 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)
|
| 63 | ((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
|
| 64 | }
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 | static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 67 | {
|
| 68 | if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 69 | clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 70 | }
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 | |
| 73 | * We can speed up the acquire/release, if there's no debugging state to be
|
| 74 | * set up.
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 | #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
|
| 77 | # define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (cmpxchg(&l->owner, c, n) == c)
|
| 78 | static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 79 | {
|
| 80 | unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner;
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 | do {
|
| 83 | owner = *p;
|
| 84 | } while (cmpxchg(p, owner, owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner);
|
| 85 | }
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 | |
| 88 | * Safe fastpath aware unlock:
|
| 89 | * 1) Clear the waiters bit
|
| 90 | * 2) Drop lock->wait_lock
|
| 91 | * 3) Try to unlock the lock with cmpxchg
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 | static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 94 | __releases(lock->wait_lock)
|
| 95 | {
|
| 96 | struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 | clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 99 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 100 | |
| 101 | * If a new waiter comes in between the unlock and the cmpxchg
|
| 102 | * we have two situations:
|
| 103 | *
|
| 104 | * unlock(wait_lock);
|
| 105 | * lock(wait_lock);
|
| 106 | * cmpxchg(p, owner, 0) == owner
|
| 107 | * mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 108 | * acquire(lock);
|
| 109 | * or:
|
| 110 | *
|
| 111 | * unlock(wait_lock);
|
| 112 | * lock(wait_lock);
|
| 113 | * mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 114 | *
|
| 115 | * cmpxchg(p, owner, 0) != owner
|
| 116 | * enqueue_waiter();
|
| 117 | * unlock(wait_lock);
|
| 118 | * lock(wait_lock);
|
| 119 | * wake waiter();
|
| 120 | * unlock(wait_lock);
|
| 121 | * lock(wait_lock);
|
| 122 | * acquire(lock);
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 | return rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, owner, NULL);
|
| 125 | }
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 | #else
|
| 128 | # define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (0)
|
| 129 | static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 130 | {
|
| 131 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)
|
| 132 | ((unsigned long)lock->owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
|
| 133 | }
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 | |
| 136 | * Simple slow path only version: lock->owner is protected by lock->wait_lock.
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 | static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 139 | __releases(lock->wait_lock)
|
| 140 | {
|
| 141 | lock->owner = NULL;
|
| 142 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 143 | return true;
|
| 144 | }
|
| 145 | #endif
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 | static inline int
|
| 148 | rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
|
| 149 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *right)
|
| 150 | {
|
| 151 | if (left->prio < right->prio)
|
| 152 | return 1;
|
| 153 |
|
| 154 | |
| 155 | * If both waiters have dl_prio(), we check the deadlines of the
|
| 156 | * associated tasks.
|
| 157 | * If left waiter has a dl_prio(), and we didn't return 1 above,
|
| 158 | * then right waiter has a dl_prio() too.
|
| 159 |
|
| 160 | if (dl_prio(left->prio))
|
| 161 | return (left->task->dl.deadline < right->task->dl.deadline);
|
| 162 |
|
| 163 | return 0;
|
| 164 | }
|
| 165 |
|
| 166 | static void
|
| 167 | rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 168 | {
|
| 169 | struct rb_node **link = &lock->waiters.rb_node;
|
| 170 | struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
|
| 171 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry;
|
| 172 | int leftmost = 1;
|
| 173 |
|
| 174 | while (*link) {
|
| 175 | parent = *link;
|
| 176 | entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree_entry);
|
| 177 | if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) {
|
| 178 | link = &parent->rb_left;
|
| 179 | } else {
|
| 180 | link = &parent->rb_right;
|
| 181 | leftmost = 0;
|
| 182 | }
|
| 183 | }
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 | if (leftmost)
|
| 186 | lock->waiters_leftmost = &waiter->tree_entry;
|
| 187 |
|
| 188 | rb_link_node(&waiter->tree_entry, parent, link);
|
| 189 | rb_insert_color(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
|
| 190 | }
|
| 191 |
|
| 192 | static void
|
| 193 | rt_mutex_dequeue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 194 | {
|
| 195 | if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry))
|
| 196 | return;
|
| 197 |
|
| 198 | if (lock->waiters_leftmost == &waiter->tree_entry)
|
| 199 | lock->waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->tree_entry);
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 | rb_erase(&waiter->tree_entry, &lock->waiters);
|
| 202 | RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree_entry);
|
| 203 | }
|
| 204 |
|
| 205 | static void
|
| 206 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 207 | {
|
| 208 | struct rb_node **link = &task->pi_waiters.rb_node;
|
| 209 | struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
|
| 210 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *entry;
|
| 211 | int leftmost = 1;
|
| 212 |
|
| 213 | while (*link) {
|
| 214 | parent = *link;
|
| 215 | entry = rb_entry(parent, struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry);
|
| 216 | if (rt_mutex_waiter_less(waiter, entry)) {
|
| 217 | link = &parent->rb_left;
|
| 218 | } else {
|
| 219 | link = &parent->rb_right;
|
| 220 | leftmost = 0;
|
| 221 | }
|
| 222 | }
|
| 223 |
|
| 224 | if (leftmost)
|
| 225 | task->pi_waiters_leftmost = &waiter->pi_tree_entry;
|
| 226 |
|
| 227 | rb_link_node(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, parent, link);
|
| 228 | rb_insert_color(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
|
| 229 | }
|
| 230 |
|
| 231 | static void
|
| 232 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 233 | {
|
| 234 | if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry))
|
| 235 | return;
|
| 236 |
|
| 237 | if (task->pi_waiters_leftmost == &waiter->pi_tree_entry)
|
| 238 | task->pi_waiters_leftmost = rb_next(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
|
| 239 |
|
| 240 | rb_erase(&waiter->pi_tree_entry, &task->pi_waiters);
|
| 241 | RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree_entry);
|
| 242 | }
|
| 243 |
|
| 244 | |
| 245 | * Calculate task priority from the waiter tree priority
|
| 246 | *
|
| 247 | * Return task->normal_prio when the waiter tree is empty or when
|
| 248 | * the waiter is not allowed to do priority boosting
|
| 249 |
|
| 250 | int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *task)
|
| 251 | {
|
| 252 | if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task)))
|
| 253 | return task->normal_prio;
|
| 254 |
|
| 255 | return min(task_top_pi_waiter(task)->prio,
|
| 256 | task->normal_prio);
|
| 257 | }
|
| 258 |
|
| 259 | struct task_struct *rt_mutex_get_top_task(struct task_struct *task)
|
| 260 | {
|
| 261 | if (likely(!task_has_pi_waiters(task)))
|
| 262 | return NULL;
|
| 263 |
|
| 264 | return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task;
|
| 265 | }
|
| 266 |
|
| 267 | |
| 268 | * Called by sched_setscheduler() to get the priority which will be
|
| 269 | * effective after the change.
|
| 270 |
|
| 271 | int rt_mutex_get_effective_prio(struct task_struct *task, int newprio)
|
| 272 | {
|
| 273 | if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
|
| 274 | return newprio;
|
| 275 |
|
| 276 | if (task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio <= newprio)
|
| 277 | return task_top_pi_waiter(task)->task->prio;
|
| 278 | return newprio;
|
| 279 | }
|
| 280 |
|
| 281 | |
| 282 | * Adjust the priority of a task, after its pi_waiters got modified.
|
| 283 | *
|
| 284 | * This can be both boosting and unboosting. task->pi_lock must be held.
|
| 285 |
|
| 286 | static void __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
|
| 287 | {
|
| 288 | int prio = rt_mutex_getprio(task);
|
| 289 |
|
| 290 | if (task->prio != prio || dl_prio(prio))
|
| 291 | rt_mutex_setprio(task, prio);
|
| 292 | }
|
| 293 |
|
| 294 | |
| 295 | * Adjust task priority (undo boosting). Called from the exit path of
|
| 296 | * rt_mutex_slowunlock() and rt_mutex_slowlock().
|
| 297 | *
|
| 298 | * (Note: We do this outside of the protection of lock->wait_lock to
|
| 299 | * allow the lock to be taken while or before we readjust the priority
|
| 300 | * of task. We do not use the spin_xx_mutex() variants here as we are
|
| 301 | * outside of the debug path.)
|
| 302 |
|
| 303 | void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
|
| 304 | {
|
| 305 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 306 |
|
| 307 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 308 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
|
| 309 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 310 | }
|
| 311 |
|
| 312 | |
| 313 | * Deadlock detection is conditional:
|
| 314 | *
|
| 315 | * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted
|
| 316 | * if the detect argument is == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK.
|
| 317 | *
|
| 318 | * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y, deadlock detection is always
|
| 319 | * conducted independent of the detect argument.
|
| 320 | *
|
| 321 | * If the waiter argument is NULL this indicates the deboost path and
|
| 322 | * deadlock detection is disabled independent of the detect argument
|
| 323 | * and the config settings.
|
| 324 |
|
| 325 | static bool rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
|
| 326 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
|
| 327 | {
|
| 328 | |
| 329 | * This is just a wrapper function for the following call,
|
| 330 | * because debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock() smells like a magic
|
| 331 | * debug feature and I wanted to keep the cond function in the
|
| 332 | * main source file along with the comments instead of having
|
| 333 | * two of the same in the headers.
|
| 334 |
|
| 335 | return debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk);
|
| 336 | }
|
| 337 |
|
| 338 | |
| 339 | * Max number of times we'll walk the boosting chain:
|
| 340 |
|
| 341 | int max_lock_depth = 1024;
|
| 342 |
|
| 343 | static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p)
|
| 344 | {
|
| 345 | return p->pi_blocked_on ? p->pi_blocked_on->lock : NULL;
|
| 346 | }
|
| 347 |
|
| 348 | |
| 349 | * Adjust the priority chain. Also used for deadlock detection.
|
| 350 | * Decreases task's usage by one - may thus free the task.
|
| 351 | *
|
| 352 | * @task: the task owning the mutex (owner) for which a chain walk is
|
| 353 | * probably needed
|
| 354 | * @chwalk: do we have to carry out deadlock detection?
|
| 355 | * @orig_lock: the mutex (can be NULL if we are walking the chain to recheck
|
| 356 | * things for a task that has just got its priority adjusted, and
|
| 357 | * is waiting on a mutex)
|
| 358 | * @next_lock: the mutex on which the owner of @orig_lock was blocked before
|
| 359 | * we dropped its pi_lock. Is never dereferenced, only used for
|
| 360 | * comparison to detect lock chain changes.
|
| 361 | * @orig_waiter: rt_mutex_waiter struct for the task that has just donated
|
| 362 | * its priority to the mutex owner (can be NULL in the case
|
| 363 | * depicted above or if the top waiter is gone away and we are
|
| 364 | * actually deboosting the owner)
|
| 365 | * @top_task: the current top waiter
|
| 366 | *
|
| 367 | * Returns 0 or -EDEADLK.
|
| 368 | *
|
| 369 | * Chain walk basics and protection scope
|
| 370 | *
|
| 371 | * [R] refcount on task
|
| 372 | * [P] task->pi_lock held
|
| 373 | * [L] rtmutex->wait_lock held
|
| 374 | *
|
| 375 | * Step Description Protected by
|
| 376 | * function arguments:
|
| 377 | * @task [R]
|
| 378 | * @orig_lock if != NULL @top_task is blocked on it
|
| 379 | * @next_lock Unprotected. Cannot be
|
| 380 | * dereferenced. Only used for
|
| 381 | * comparison.
|
| 382 | * @orig_waiter if != NULL @top_task is blocked on it
|
| 383 | * @top_task current, or in case of proxy
|
| 384 | * locking protected by calling
|
| 385 | * code
|
| 386 | * again:
|
| 387 | * loop_sanity_check();
|
| 388 | * retry:
|
| 389 | * [1] lock(task->pi_lock); [R] acquire [P]
|
| 390 | * [2] waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; [P]
|
| 391 | * [3] check_exit_conditions_1(); [P]
|
| 392 | * [4] lock = waiter->lock; [P]
|
| 393 | * [5] if (!try_lock(lock->wait_lock)) { [P] try to acquire [L]
|
| 394 | * unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P]
|
| 395 | * goto retry;
|
| 396 | * }
|
| 397 | * [6] check_exit_conditions_2(); [P] + [L]
|
| 398 | * [7] requeue_lock_waiter(lock, waiter); [P] + [L]
|
| 399 | * [8] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P]
|
| 400 | * put_task_struct(task); release [R]
|
| 401 | * [9] check_exit_conditions_3(); [L]
|
| 402 | * [10] task = owner(lock); [L]
|
| 403 | * get_task_struct(task); [L] acquire [R]
|
| 404 | * lock(task->pi_lock); [L] acquire [P]
|
| 405 | * [11] requeue_pi_waiter(tsk, waiters(lock));[P] + [L]
|
| 406 | * [12] check_exit_conditions_4(); [P] + [L]
|
| 407 | * [13] unlock(task->pi_lock); release [P]
|
| 408 | * unlock(lock->wait_lock); release [L]
|
| 409 | * goto again;
|
| 410 |
|
| 411 | static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
| 412 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
|
| 413 | struct rt_mutex *orig_lock,
|
| 414 | struct rt_mutex *next_lock,
|
| 415 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter,
|
| 416 | struct task_struct *top_task)
|
| 417 | {
|
| 418 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter;
|
| 419 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *prerequeue_top_waiter;
|
| 420 | int ret = 0, depth = 0;
|
| 421 | struct rt_mutex *lock;
|
| 422 | bool detect_deadlock;
|
| 423 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 424 | bool requeue = true;
|
| 425 |
|
| 426 | detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(orig_waiter, chwalk);
|
| 427 |
|
| 428 | |
| 429 | * The (de)boosting is a step by step approach with a lot of
|
| 430 | * pitfalls. We want this to be preemptible and we want hold a
|
| 431 | * maximum of two locks per step. So we have to check
|
| 432 | * carefully whether things change under us.
|
| 433 |
|
| 434 | again:
|
| 435 | |
| 436 | * We limit the lock chain length for each invocation.
|
| 437 |
|
| 438 | if (++depth > max_lock_depth) {
|
| 439 | static int prev_max;
|
| 440 |
|
| 441 | |
| 442 | * Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit,
|
| 443 | * print a new message when reaching the limit again.
|
| 444 |
|
| 445 | if (prev_max != max_lock_depth) {
|
| 446 | prev_max = max_lock_depth;
|
| 447 | printk(KERN_WARNING "Maximum lock depth %d reached "
|
| 448 | "task: %s (%d)\n", max_lock_depth,
|
| 449 | top_task->comm, task_pid_nr(top_task));
|
| 450 | }
|
| 451 | put_task_struct(task);
|
| 452 |
|
| 453 | return -EDEADLK;
|
| 454 | }
|
| 455 |
|
| 456 | |
| 457 | * We are fully preemptible here and only hold the refcount on
|
| 458 | * @task. So everything can have changed under us since the
|
| 459 | * caller or our own code below (goto retry/again) dropped all
|
| 460 | * locks.
|
| 461 |
|
| 462 | retry:
|
| 463 | |
| 464 | * [1] Task cannot go away as we did a get_task() before !
|
| 465 |
|
| 466 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 467 |
|
| 468 | |
| 469 | * [2] Get the waiter on which @task is blocked on.
|
| 470 |
|
| 471 | waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
|
| 472 |
|
| 473 | |
| 474 | * [3] check_exit_conditions_1() protected by task->pi_lock.
|
| 475 |
|
| 476 |
|
| 477 | |
| 478 | * Check whether the end of the boosting chain has been
|
| 479 | * reached or the state of the chain has changed while we
|
| 480 | * dropped the locks.
|
| 481 |
|
| 482 | if (!waiter)
|
| 483 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 484 |
|
| 485 | |
| 486 | * Check the orig_waiter state. After we dropped the locks,
|
| 487 | * the previous owner of the lock might have released the lock.
|
| 488 |
|
| 489 | if (orig_waiter && !rt_mutex_owner(orig_lock))
|
| 490 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 491 |
|
| 492 | |
| 493 | * We dropped all locks after taking a refcount on @task, so
|
| 494 | * the task might have moved on in the lock chain or even left
|
| 495 | * the chain completely and blocks now on an unrelated lock or
|
| 496 | * on @orig_lock.
|
| 497 | *
|
| 498 | * We stored the lock on which @task was blocked in @next_lock,
|
| 499 | * so we can detect the chain change.
|
| 500 |
|
| 501 | if (next_lock != waiter->lock)
|
| 502 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 503 |
|
| 504 | |
| 505 | * Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note,
|
| 506 | * top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting
|
| 507 | * mode!
|
| 508 |
|
| 509 | if (top_waiter) {
|
| 510 | if (!task_has_pi_waiters(task))
|
| 511 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 512 | |
| 513 | * If deadlock detection is off, we stop here if we
|
| 514 | * are not the top pi waiter of the task. If deadlock
|
| 515 | * detection is enabled we continue, but stop the
|
| 516 | * requeueing in the chain walk.
|
| 517 |
|
| 518 | if (top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(task)) {
|
| 519 | if (!detect_deadlock)
|
| 520 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 521 | else
|
| 522 | requeue = false;
|
| 523 | }
|
| 524 | }
|
| 525 |
|
| 526 | |
| 527 | * If the waiter priority is the same as the task priority
|
| 528 | * then there is no further priority adjustment necessary. If
|
| 529 | * deadlock detection is off, we stop the chain walk. If its
|
| 530 | * enabled we continue, but stop the requeueing in the chain
|
| 531 | * walk.
|
| 532 |
|
| 533 | if (waiter->prio == task->prio) {
|
| 534 | if (!detect_deadlock)
|
| 535 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 536 | else
|
| 537 | requeue = false;
|
| 538 | }
|
| 539 |
|
| 540 | |
| 541 | * [4] Get the next lock
|
| 542 |
|
| 543 | lock = waiter->lock;
|
| 544 | |
| 545 | * [5] We need to trylock here as we are holding task->pi_lock,
|
| 546 | * which is the reverse lock order versus the other rtmutex
|
| 547 | * operations.
|
| 548 |
|
| 549 | if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) {
|
| 550 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 551 | cpu_relax();
|
| 552 | goto retry;
|
| 553 | }
|
| 554 |
|
| 555 | |
| 556 | * [6] check_exit_conditions_2() protected by task->pi_lock and
|
| 557 | * lock->wait_lock.
|
| 558 | *
|
| 559 | * Deadlock detection. If the lock is the same as the original
|
| 560 | * lock which caused us to walk the lock chain or if the
|
| 561 | * current lock is owned by the task which initiated the chain
|
| 562 | * walk, we detected a deadlock.
|
| 563 |
|
| 564 | if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) {
|
| 565 | debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(chwalk, orig_waiter, lock);
|
| 566 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 567 | ret = -EDEADLK;
|
| 568 | goto out_unlock_pi;
|
| 569 | }
|
| 570 |
|
| 571 | |
| 572 | * If we just follow the lock chain for deadlock detection, no
|
| 573 | * need to do all the requeue operations. To avoid a truckload
|
| 574 | * of conditionals around the various places below, just do the
|
| 575 | * minimum chain walk checks.
|
| 576 |
|
| 577 | if (!requeue) {
|
| 578 | |
| 579 | * No requeue[7] here. Just release @task [8]
|
| 580 |
|
| 581 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 582 | put_task_struct(task);
|
| 583 |
|
| 584 | |
| 585 | * [9] check_exit_conditions_3 protected by lock->wait_lock.
|
| 586 | * If there is no owner of the lock, end of chain.
|
| 587 |
|
| 588 | if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
|
| 589 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 590 | return 0;
|
| 591 | }
|
| 592 |
|
| 593 |
|
| 594 | task = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
| 595 | get_task_struct(task);
|
| 596 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 597 |
|
| 598 | |
| 599 | * No requeue [11] here. We just do deadlock detection.
|
| 600 | *
|
| 601 | * [12] Store whether owner is blocked
|
| 602 | * itself. Decision is made after dropping the locks
|
| 603 |
|
| 604 | next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(task);
|
| 605 | |
| 606 | * Get the top waiter for the next iteration
|
| 607 |
|
| 608 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 609 |
|
| 610 |
|
| 611 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 612 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 613 |
|
| 614 |
|
| 615 | if (!next_lock)
|
| 616 | goto out_put_task;
|
| 617 | goto again;
|
| 618 | }
|
| 619 |
|
| 620 | |
| 621 | * Store the current top waiter before doing the requeue
|
| 622 | * operation on @lock. We need it for the boost/deboost
|
| 623 | * decision below.
|
| 624 |
|
| 625 | prerequeue_top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 626 |
|
| 627 |
|
| 628 | rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
| 629 | waiter->prio = task->prio;
|
| 630 | rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
|
| 631 |
|
| 632 |
|
| 633 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 634 | put_task_struct(task);
|
| 635 |
|
| 636 | |
| 637 | * [9] check_exit_conditions_3 protected by lock->wait_lock.
|
| 638 | *
|
| 639 | * We must abort the chain walk if there is no lock owner even
|
| 640 | * in the dead lock detection case, as we have nothing to
|
| 641 | * follow here. This is the end of the chain we are walking.
|
| 642 |
|
| 643 | if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
|
| 644 | |
| 645 | * If the requeue [7] above changed the top waiter,
|
| 646 | * then we need to wake the new top waiter up to try
|
| 647 | * to get the lock.
|
| 648 |
|
| 649 | if (prerequeue_top_waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
|
| 650 | wake_up_process(rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task);
|
| 651 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 652 | return 0;
|
| 653 | }
|
| 654 |
|
| 655 |
|
| 656 | task = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
| 657 | get_task_struct(task);
|
| 658 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 659 |
|
| 660 |
|
| 661 | if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
|
| 662 | |
| 663 | * The waiter became the new top (highest priority)
|
| 664 | * waiter on the lock. Replace the previous top waiter
|
| 665 | * in the owner tasks pi waiters tree with this waiter
|
| 666 | * and adjust the priority of the owner.
|
| 667 |
|
| 668 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, prerequeue_top_waiter);
|
| 669 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
|
| 670 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
|
| 671 |
|
| 672 | } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) {
|
| 673 | |
| 674 | * The waiter was the top waiter on the lock, but is
|
| 675 | * no longer the top prority waiter. Replace waiter in
|
| 676 | * the owner tasks pi waiters tree with the new top
|
| 677 | * (highest priority) waiter and adjust the priority
|
| 678 | * of the owner.
|
| 679 | * The new top waiter is stored in @waiter so that
|
| 680 | * @waiter == @top_waiter evaluates to true below and
|
| 681 | * we continue to deboost the rest of the chain.
|
| 682 |
|
| 683 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter);
|
| 684 | waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 685 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter);
|
| 686 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
|
| 687 | } else {
|
| 688 | |
| 689 | * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority
|
| 690 | * adjustment.
|
| 691 |
|
| 692 | }
|
| 693 |
|
| 694 | |
| 695 | * [12] check_exit_conditions_4() protected by task->pi_lock
|
| 696 | * and lock->wait_lock. The actual decisions are made after we
|
| 697 | * dropped the locks.
|
| 698 | *
|
| 699 | * Check whether the task which owns the current lock is pi
|
| 700 | * blocked itself. If yes we store a pointer to the lock for
|
| 701 | * the lock chain change detection above. After we dropped
|
| 702 | * task->pi_lock next_lock cannot be dereferenced anymore.
|
| 703 |
|
| 704 | next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(task);
|
| 705 | |
| 706 | * Store the top waiter of @lock for the end of chain walk
|
| 707 | * decision below.
|
| 708 |
|
| 709 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 710 |
|
| 711 |
|
| 712 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 713 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 714 |
|
| 715 | |
| 716 | * Make the actual exit decisions [12], based on the stored
|
| 717 | * values.
|
| 718 | *
|
| 719 | * We reached the end of the lock chain. Stop right here. No
|
| 720 | * point to go back just to figure that out.
|
| 721 |
|
| 722 | if (!next_lock)
|
| 723 | goto out_put_task;
|
| 724 |
|
| 725 | |
| 726 | * If the current waiter is not the top waiter on the lock,
|
| 727 | * then we can stop the chain walk here if we are not in full
|
| 728 | * deadlock detection mode.
|
| 729 |
|
| 730 | if (!detect_deadlock && waiter != top_waiter)
|
| 731 | goto out_put_task;
|
| 732 |
|
| 733 | goto again;
|
| 734 |
|
| 735 | out_unlock_pi:
|
| 736 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 737 | out_put_task:
|
| 738 | put_task_struct(task);
|
| 739 |
|
| 740 | return ret;
|
| 741 | }
|
| 742 |
|
| 743 | |
| 744 | * Try to take an rt-mutex
|
| 745 | *
|
| 746 | * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held.
|
| 747 | *
|
| 748 | * @lock: The lock to be acquired.
|
| 749 | * @task: The task which wants to acquire the lock
|
| 750 | * @waiter: The waiter that is queued to the lock's wait tree if the
|
| 751 | * callsite called task_blocked_on_lock(), otherwise NULL
|
| 752 |
|
| 753 | static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
|
| 754 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 755 | {
|
| 756 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 757 |
|
| 758 | |
| 759 | * Before testing whether we can acquire @lock, we set the
|
| 760 | * RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit in @lock->owner. This forces all
|
| 761 | * other tasks which try to modify @lock into the slow path
|
| 762 | * and they serialize on @lock->wait_lock.
|
| 763 | *
|
| 764 | * The RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit can have a transitional state
|
| 765 | * as explained at the top of this file if and only if:
|
| 766 | *
|
| 767 | * - There is a lock owner. The caller must fixup the
|
| 768 | * transient state if it does a trylock or leaves the lock
|
| 769 | * function due to a signal or timeout.
|
| 770 | *
|
| 771 | * - @task acquires the lock and there are no other
|
| 772 | * waiters. This is undone in rt_mutex_set_owner(@task) at
|
| 773 | * the end of this function.
|
| 774 |
|
| 775 | mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 776 |
|
| 777 | |
| 778 | * If @lock has an owner, give up.
|
| 779 |
|
| 780 | if (rt_mutex_owner(lock))
|
| 781 | return 0;
|
| 782 |
|
| 783 | |
| 784 | * If @waiter != NULL, @task has already enqueued the waiter
|
| 785 | * into @lock waiter tree. If @waiter == NULL then this is a
|
| 786 | * trylock attempt.
|
| 787 |
|
| 788 | if (waiter) {
|
| 789 | |
| 790 | * If waiter is not the highest priority waiter of
|
| 791 | * @lock, give up.
|
| 792 |
|
| 793 | if (waiter != rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))
|
| 794 | return 0;
|
| 795 |
|
| 796 | |
| 797 | * We can acquire the lock. Remove the waiter from the
|
| 798 | * lock waiters tree.
|
| 799 |
|
| 800 | rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
| 801 |
|
| 802 | } else {
|
| 803 | |
| 804 | * If the lock has waiters already we check whether @task is
|
| 805 | * eligible to take over the lock.
|
| 806 | *
|
| 807 | * If there are no other waiters, @task can acquire
|
| 808 | * the lock. @task->pi_blocked_on is NULL, so it does
|
| 809 | * not need to be dequeued.
|
| 810 |
|
| 811 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
|
| 812 | |
| 813 | * If @task->prio is greater than or equal to
|
| 814 | * the top waiter priority (kernel view),
|
| 815 | * @task lost.
|
| 816 |
|
| 817 | if (task->prio >= rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->prio)
|
| 818 | return 0;
|
| 819 |
|
| 820 | |
| 821 | * The current top waiter stays enqueued. We
|
| 822 | * don't have to change anything in the lock
|
| 823 | * waiters order.
|
| 824 |
|
| 825 | } else {
|
| 826 | |
| 827 | * No waiters. Take the lock without the
|
| 828 | * pi_lock dance.@task->pi_blocked_on is NULL
|
| 829 | * and we have no waiters to enqueue in @task
|
| 830 | * pi waiters tree.
|
| 831 |
|
| 832 | goto takeit;
|
| 833 | }
|
| 834 | }
|
| 835 |
|
| 836 | |
| 837 | * Clear @task->pi_blocked_on. Requires protection by
|
| 838 | * @task->pi_lock. Redundant operation for the @waiter == NULL
|
| 839 | * case, but conditionals are more expensive than a redundant
|
| 840 | * store.
|
| 841 |
|
| 842 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 843 | task->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
|
| 844 | |
| 845 | * Finish the lock acquisition. @task is the new owner. If
|
| 846 | * other waiters exist we have to insert the highest priority
|
| 847 | * waiter into @task->pi_waiters tree.
|
| 848 |
|
| 849 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 850 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
|
| 851 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 852 |
|
| 853 | takeit:
|
| 854 |
|
| 855 | debug_rt_mutex_lock(lock);
|
| 856 |
|
| 857 | |
| 858 | * This either preserves the RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit if there
|
| 859 | * are still waiters or clears it.
|
| 860 |
|
| 861 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, task);
|
| 862 |
|
| 863 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, task);
|
| 864 |
|
| 865 | return 1;
|
| 866 | }
|
| 867 |
|
| 868 | |
| 869 | * Task blocks on lock.
|
| 870 | *
|
| 871 | * Prepare waiter and propagate pi chain
|
| 872 | *
|
| 873 | * This must be called with lock->wait_lock held.
|
| 874 |
|
| 875 | static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 876 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
|
| 877 | struct task_struct *task,
|
| 878 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
|
| 879 | {
|
| 880 | struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
| 881 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter;
|
| 882 | struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
|
| 883 | int chain_walk = 0, res;
|
| 884 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 885 |
|
| 886 | |
| 887 | * Early deadlock detection. We really don't want the task to
|
| 888 | * enqueue on itself just to untangle the mess later. It's not
|
| 889 | * only an optimization. We drop the locks, so another waiter
|
| 890 | * can come in before the chain walk detects the deadlock. So
|
| 891 | * the other will detect the deadlock and return -EDEADLOCK,
|
| 892 | * which is wrong, as the other waiter is not in a deadlock
|
| 893 | * situation.
|
| 894 |
|
| 895 | if (owner == task)
|
| 896 | return -EDEADLK;
|
| 897 |
|
| 898 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 899 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
|
| 900 | waiter->task = task;
|
| 901 | waiter->lock = lock;
|
| 902 | waiter->prio = task->prio;
|
| 903 |
|
| 904 |
|
| 905 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 906 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 907 | rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter);
|
| 908 |
|
| 909 | task->pi_blocked_on = waiter;
|
| 910 |
|
| 911 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 912 |
|
| 913 | if (!owner)
|
| 914 | return 0;
|
| 915 |
|
| 916 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 917 | if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
|
| 918 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter);
|
| 919 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter);
|
| 920 |
|
| 921 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
|
| 922 | if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
|
| 923 | chain_walk = 1;
|
| 924 | } else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk)) {
|
| 925 | chain_walk = 1;
|
| 926 | }
|
| 927 |
|
| 928 |
|
| 929 | next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner);
|
| 930 |
|
| 931 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 932 | |
| 933 | * Even if full deadlock detection is on, if the owner is not
|
| 934 | * blocked itself, we can avoid finding this out in the chain
|
| 935 | * walk.
|
| 936 |
|
| 937 | if (!chain_walk || !next_lock)
|
| 938 | return 0;
|
| 939 |
|
| 940 | |
| 941 | * The owner can't disappear while holding a lock,
|
| 942 | * so the owner struct is protected by wait_lock.
|
| 943 | * Gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()!
|
| 944 |
|
| 945 | get_task_struct(owner);
|
| 946 |
|
| 947 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 948 |
|
| 949 | res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, chwalk, lock,
|
| 950 | next_lock, waiter, task);
|
| 951 |
|
| 952 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 953 |
|
| 954 | return res;
|
| 955 | }
|
| 956 |
|
| 957 | |
| 958 | * Remove the top waiter from the current tasks pi waiter tree and
|
| 959 | * queue it up.
|
| 960 | *
|
| 961 | * Called with lock->wait_lock held.
|
| 962 |
|
| 963 | static void mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct wake_q_head *wake_q,
|
| 964 | struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 965 | {
|
| 966 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
|
| 967 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 968 |
|
| 969 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 970 |
|
| 971 | waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
| 972 |
|
| 973 | |
| 974 | * Remove it from current->pi_waiters. We do not adjust a
|
| 975 | * possible priority boost right now. We execute wakeup in the
|
| 976 | * boosted mode and go back to normal after releasing
|
| 977 | * lock->wait_lock.
|
| 978 |
|
| 979 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter);
|
| 980 |
|
| 981 | |
| 982 | * As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays
|
| 983 | * queued on the lock until it gets the lock, this lock
|
| 984 | * obviously has waiters. Just set the bit here and this has
|
| 985 | * the added benefit of forcing all new tasks into the
|
| 986 | * slow path making sure no task of lower priority than
|
| 987 | * the top waiter can steal this lock.
|
| 988 |
|
| 989 | lock->owner = (void *) RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS;
|
| 990 |
|
| 991 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 992 |
|
| 993 | wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task);
|
| 994 | }
|
| 995 |
|
| 996 | |
| 997 | * Remove a waiter from a lock and give up
|
| 998 | *
|
| 999 | * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and
|
| 1000 | * have just failed to try_to_take_rt_mutex().
|
| 1001 |
|
| 1002 | static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1003 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 1004 | {
|
| 1005 | bool is_top_waiter = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
|
| 1006 | struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
| 1007 | struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
|
| 1008 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 1009 |
|
| 1010 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 1011 | rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
| 1012 | current->pi_blocked_on = NULL;
|
| 1013 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 1014 |
|
| 1015 | |
| 1016 | * Only update priority if the waiter was the highest priority
|
| 1017 | * waiter of the lock and there is an owner to update.
|
| 1018 |
|
| 1019 | if (!owner || !is_top_waiter)
|
| 1020 | return;
|
| 1021 |
|
| 1022 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 1023 |
|
| 1024 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, waiter);
|
| 1025 |
|
| 1026 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 1027 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
|
| 1028 |
|
| 1029 | __rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
|
| 1030 |
|
| 1031 |
|
| 1032 | next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner);
|
| 1033 |
|
| 1034 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 1035 |
|
| 1036 | |
| 1037 | * Don't walk the chain, if the owner task is not blocked
|
| 1038 | * itself.
|
| 1039 |
|
| 1040 | if (!next_lock)
|
| 1041 | return;
|
| 1042 |
|
| 1043 |
|
| 1044 | get_task_struct(owner);
|
| 1045 |
|
| 1046 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1047 |
|
| 1048 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, lock,
|
| 1049 | next_lock, NULL, current);
|
| 1050 |
|
| 1051 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1052 | }
|
| 1053 |
|
| 1054 | |
| 1055 | * Recheck the pi chain, in case we got a priority setting
|
| 1056 | *
|
| 1057 | * Called from sched_setscheduler
|
| 1058 |
|
| 1059 | void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
|
| 1060 | {
|
| 1061 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
|
| 1062 | struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
|
| 1063 | unsigned long flags;
|
| 1064 |
|
| 1065 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 1066 |
|
| 1067 | waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
|
| 1068 | if (!waiter || (waiter->prio == task->prio &&
|
| 1069 | !dl_prio(task->prio))) {
|
| 1070 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 1071 | return;
|
| 1072 | }
|
| 1073 | next_lock = waiter->lock;
|
| 1074 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
| 1075 |
|
| 1076 |
|
| 1077 | get_task_struct(task);
|
| 1078 |
|
| 1079 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, NULL,
|
| 1080 | next_lock, NULL, task);
|
| 1081 | }
|
| 1082 |
|
| 1083 | |
| 1084 | * __rt_mutex_slowlock() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop
|
| 1085 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to take
|
| 1086 | * @state: the state the task should block in (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
|
| 1087 | * or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
|
| 1088 | * @timeout: the pre-initialized and started timer, or NULL for none
|
| 1089 | * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
|
| 1090 | *
|
| 1091 | * lock->wait_lock must be held by the caller.
|
| 1092 |
|
| 1093 | static int __sched
|
| 1094 | __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 1095 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
|
| 1096 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 1097 | {
|
| 1098 | int ret = 0;
|
| 1099 |
|
| 1100 | for (;;) {
|
| 1101 |
|
| 1102 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter))
|
| 1103 | break;
|
| 1104 |
|
| 1105 | |
| 1106 | * TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE checks for signals and
|
| 1107 | * timeout. Ignored otherwise.
|
| 1108 |
|
| 1109 | if (unlikely(state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)) {
|
| 1110 |
|
| 1111 | if (signal_pending(current))
|
| 1112 | ret = -EINTR;
|
| 1113 | if (timeout && !timeout->task)
|
| 1114 | ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
|
| 1115 | if (ret)
|
| 1116 | break;
|
| 1117 | }
|
| 1118 |
|
| 1119 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1120 |
|
| 1121 | debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter);
|
| 1122 |
|
| 1123 | schedule();
|
| 1124 |
|
| 1125 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1126 | set_current_state(state);
|
| 1127 | }
|
| 1128 |
|
| 1129 | __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
| 1130 | return ret;
|
| 1131 | }
|
| 1132 |
|
| 1133 | static void rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock,
|
| 1134 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
|
| 1135 | {
|
| 1136 | |
| 1137 | * If the result is not -EDEADLOCK or the caller requested
|
| 1138 | * deadlock detection, nothing to do here.
|
| 1139 |
|
| 1140 | if (res != -EDEADLOCK || detect_deadlock)
|
| 1141 | return;
|
| 1142 |
|
| 1143 | |
| 1144 | * Yell lowdly and stop the task right here.
|
| 1145 |
|
| 1146 | rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w);
|
| 1147 | while (1) {
|
| 1148 | set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
| 1149 | schedule();
|
| 1150 | }
|
| 1151 | }
|
| 1152 |
|
| 1153 | |
| 1154 | * Slow path lock function:
|
| 1155 |
|
| 1156 | static int __sched
|
| 1157 | rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 1158 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
|
| 1159 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk)
|
| 1160 | {
|
| 1161 | struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
|
| 1162 | int ret = 0;
|
| 1163 |
|
| 1164 | debug_rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter);
|
| 1165 | RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.pi_tree_entry);
|
| 1166 | RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter.tree_entry);
|
| 1167 |
|
| 1168 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1169 |
|
| 1170 |
|
| 1171 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) {
|
| 1172 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1173 | return 0;
|
| 1174 | }
|
| 1175 |
|
| 1176 | set_current_state(state);
|
| 1177 |
|
| 1178 |
|
| 1179 | if (unlikely(timeout))
|
| 1180 | hrtimer_start_expires(&timeout->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
|
| 1181 |
|
| 1182 | ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, chwalk);
|
| 1183 |
|
| 1184 | if (likely(!ret))
|
| 1185 |
|
| 1186 | ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, state, timeout, &waiter);
|
| 1187 |
|
| 1188 | if (unlikely(ret)) {
|
| 1189 | __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
| 1190 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 1191 | remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
|
| 1192 | rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, chwalk, &waiter);
|
| 1193 | }
|
| 1194 |
|
| 1195 | |
| 1196 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit
|
| 1197 | * unconditionally. We might have to fix that up.
|
| 1198 |
|
| 1199 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 1200 |
|
| 1201 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1202 |
|
| 1203 |
|
| 1204 | if (unlikely(timeout))
|
| 1205 | hrtimer_cancel(&timeout->timer);
|
| 1206 |
|
| 1207 | debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
|
| 1208 |
|
| 1209 | return ret;
|
| 1210 | }
|
| 1211 |
|
| 1212 | |
| 1213 | * Slow path try-lock function:
|
| 1214 |
|
| 1215 | static inline int rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 1216 | {
|
| 1217 | int ret;
|
| 1218 |
|
| 1219 | |
| 1220 | * If the lock already has an owner we fail to get the lock.
|
| 1221 | * This can be done without taking the @lock->wait_lock as
|
| 1222 | * it is only being read, and this is a trylock anyway.
|
| 1223 |
|
| 1224 | if (rt_mutex_owner(lock))
|
| 1225 | return 0;
|
| 1226 |
|
| 1227 | |
| 1228 | * The mutex has currently no owner. Lock the wait lock and
|
| 1229 | * try to acquire the lock.
|
| 1230 |
|
| 1231 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1232 |
|
| 1233 | ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL);
|
| 1234 |
|
| 1235 | |
| 1236 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters bit
|
| 1237 | * unconditionally. Clean this up.
|
| 1238 |
|
| 1239 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 1240 |
|
| 1241 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1242 |
|
| 1243 | return ret;
|
| 1244 | }
|
| 1245 |
|
| 1246 | |
| 1247 | * Slow path to release a rt-mutex.
|
| 1248 | * Return whether the current task needs to undo a potential priority boosting.
|
| 1249 |
|
| 1250 | static bool __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1251 | struct wake_q_head *wake_q)
|
| 1252 | {
|
| 1253 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1254 |
|
| 1255 | debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock);
|
| 1256 |
|
| 1257 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
|
| 1258 |
|
| 1259 | |
| 1260 | * We must be careful here if the fast path is enabled. If we
|
| 1261 | * have no waiters queued we cannot set owner to NULL here
|
| 1262 | * because of:
|
| 1263 | *
|
| 1264 | * foo->lock->owner = NULL;
|
| 1265 | * rtmutex_lock(foo->lock); <- fast path
|
| 1266 | * free = atomic_dec_and_test(foo->refcnt);
|
| 1267 | * rtmutex_unlock(foo->lock); <- fast path
|
| 1268 | * if (free)
|
| 1269 | * kfree(foo);
|
| 1270 | * raw_spin_unlock(foo->lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1271 | *
|
| 1272 | * So for the fastpath enabled kernel:
|
| 1273 | *
|
| 1274 | * Nothing can set the waiters bit as long as we hold
|
| 1275 | * lock->wait_lock. So we do the following sequence:
|
| 1276 | *
|
| 1277 | * owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
| 1278 | * clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 1279 | * raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1280 | * if (cmpxchg(&lock->owner, owner, 0) == owner)
|
| 1281 | * return;
|
| 1282 | * goto retry;
|
| 1283 | *
|
| 1284 | * The fastpath disabled variant is simple as all access to
|
| 1285 | * lock->owner is serialized by lock->wait_lock:
|
| 1286 | *
|
| 1287 | * lock->owner = NULL;
|
| 1288 | * raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1289 |
|
| 1290 | while (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
|
| 1291 |
|
| 1292 | if (unlock_rt_mutex_safe(lock) == true)
|
| 1293 | return false;
|
| 1294 |
|
| 1295 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1296 | }
|
| 1297 |
|
| 1298 | |
| 1299 | * The wakeup next waiter path does not suffer from the above
|
| 1300 | * race. See the comments there.
|
| 1301 | *
|
| 1302 | * Queue the next waiter for wakeup once we release the wait_lock.
|
| 1303 |
|
| 1304 | mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wake_q, lock);
|
| 1305 |
|
| 1306 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1307 |
|
| 1308 |
|
| 1309 | return true;
|
| 1310 | }
|
| 1311 |
|
| 1312 | |
| 1313 | * debug aware fast / slowpath lock,trylock,unlock
|
| 1314 | *
|
| 1315 | * The atomic acquire/release ops are compiled away, when either the
|
| 1316 | * architecture does not support cmpxchg or when debugging is enabled.
|
| 1317 |
|
| 1318 | static inline int
|
| 1319 | rt_mutex_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 1320 | int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 1321 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
|
| 1322 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk))
|
| 1323 | {
|
| 1324 | if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
|
| 1325 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
|
| 1326 | return 0;
|
| 1327 | } else
|
| 1328 | return slowfn(lock, state, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK);
|
| 1329 | }
|
| 1330 |
|
| 1331 | static inline int
|
| 1332 | rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 1333 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
|
| 1334 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk,
|
| 1335 | int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
| 1336 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout,
|
| 1337 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk))
|
| 1338 | {
|
| 1339 | if (chwalk == RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK &&
|
| 1340 | likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
|
| 1341 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
|
| 1342 | return 0;
|
| 1343 | } else
|
| 1344 | return slowfn(lock, state, timeout, chwalk);
|
| 1345 | }
|
| 1346 |
|
| 1347 | static inline int
|
| 1348 | rt_mutex_fasttrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1349 | int (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock))
|
| 1350 | {
|
| 1351 | if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, NULL, current))) {
|
| 1352 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, current);
|
| 1353 | return 1;
|
| 1354 | }
|
| 1355 | return slowfn(lock);
|
| 1356 | }
|
| 1357 |
|
| 1358 | static inline void
|
| 1359 | rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1360 | bool (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1361 | struct wake_q_head *wqh))
|
| 1362 | {
|
| 1363 | WAKE_Q(wake_q);
|
| 1364 |
|
| 1365 | if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, current, NULL))) {
|
| 1366 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
|
| 1367 |
|
| 1368 | } else {
|
| 1369 | bool deboost = slowfn(lock, &wake_q);
|
| 1370 |
|
| 1371 | wake_up_q(&wake_q);
|
| 1372 |
|
| 1373 |
|
| 1374 | if (deboost)
|
| 1375 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio(current);
|
| 1376 | }
|
| 1377 | }
|
| 1378 |
|
| 1379 | |
| 1380 | * rt_mutex_lock - lock a rt_mutex
|
| 1381 | *
|
| 1382 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 1383 |
|
| 1384 | void __sched rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 1385 | {
|
| 1386 | might_sleep();
|
| 1387 |
|
| 1388 | rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, rt_mutex_slowlock);
|
| 1389 | }
|
| 1390 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock);
|
| 1391 |
|
| 1392 | |
| 1393 | * rt_mutex_lock_interruptible - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
|
| 1394 | *
|
| 1395 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 1396 | *
|
| 1397 | * Returns:
|
| 1398 | * 0 on success
|
| 1399 | * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
|
| 1400 |
|
| 1401 | int __sched rt_mutex_lock_interruptible(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 1402 | {
|
| 1403 | might_sleep();
|
| 1404 |
|
| 1405 | return rt_mutex_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, rt_mutex_slowlock);
|
| 1406 | }
|
| 1407 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_lock_interruptible);
|
| 1408 |
|
| 1409 | |
| 1410 | * Futex variant with full deadlock detection.
|
| 1411 |
|
| 1412 | int rt_mutex_timed_futex_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1413 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
|
| 1414 | {
|
| 1415 | might_sleep();
|
| 1416 |
|
| 1417 | return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
|
| 1418 | RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK,
|
| 1419 | rt_mutex_slowlock);
|
| 1420 | }
|
| 1421 |
|
| 1422 | |
| 1423 | * rt_mutex_timed_lock - lock a rt_mutex interruptible
|
| 1424 | * the timeout structure is provided
|
| 1425 | * by the caller
|
| 1426 | *
|
| 1427 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 1428 | * @timeout: timeout structure or NULL (no timeout)
|
| 1429 | *
|
| 1430 | * Returns:
|
| 1431 | * 0 on success
|
| 1432 | * -EINTR when interrupted by a signal
|
| 1433 | * -ETIMEDOUT when the timeout expired
|
| 1434 |
|
| 1435 | int
|
| 1436 | rt_mutex_timed_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
|
| 1437 | {
|
| 1438 | might_sleep();
|
| 1439 |
|
| 1440 | return rt_mutex_timed_fastlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, timeout,
|
| 1441 | RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK,
|
| 1442 | rt_mutex_slowlock);
|
| 1443 | }
|
| 1444 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_timed_lock);
|
| 1445 |
|
| 1446 | |
| 1447 | * rt_mutex_trylock - try to lock a rt_mutex
|
| 1448 | *
|
| 1449 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 1450 | *
|
| 1451 | * This function can only be called in thread context. It's safe to
|
| 1452 | * call it from atomic regions, but not from hard interrupt or soft
|
| 1453 | * interrupt context.
|
| 1454 | *
|
| 1455 | * Returns 1 on success and 0 on contention
|
| 1456 |
|
| 1457 | int __sched rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 1458 | {
|
| 1459 | if (WARN_ON(in_irq() || in_nmi() || in_serving_softirq()))
|
| 1460 | return 0;
|
| 1461 |
|
| 1462 | return rt_mutex_fasttrylock(lock, rt_mutex_slowtrylock);
|
| 1463 | }
|
| 1464 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_trylock);
|
| 1465 |
|
| 1466 | |
| 1467 | * rt_mutex_unlock - unlock a rt_mutex
|
| 1468 | *
|
| 1469 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked
|
| 1470 |
|
| 1471 | void __sched rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 1472 | {
|
| 1473 | rt_mutex_fastunlock(lock, rt_mutex_slowunlock);
|
| 1474 | }
|
| 1475 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_unlock);
|
| 1476 |
|
| 1477 | |
| 1478 | * rt_mutex_futex_unlock - Futex variant of rt_mutex_unlock
|
| 1479 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be unlocked
|
| 1480 | *
|
| 1481 | * Returns: true/false indicating whether priority adjustment is
|
| 1482 | * required or not.
|
| 1483 |
|
| 1484 | bool __sched rt_mutex_futex_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1485 | struct wake_q_head *wqh)
|
| 1486 | {
|
| 1487 | if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, current, NULL))) {
|
| 1488 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
|
| 1489 | return false;
|
| 1490 | }
|
| 1491 | return rt_mutex_slowunlock(lock, wqh);
|
| 1492 | }
|
| 1493 |
|
| 1494 | |
| 1495 | * rt_mutex_destroy - mark a mutex unusable
|
| 1496 | * @lock: the mutex to be destroyed
|
| 1497 | *
|
| 1498 | * This function marks the mutex uninitialized, and any subsequent
|
| 1499 | * use of the mutex is forbidden. The mutex must not be locked when
|
| 1500 | * this function is called.
|
| 1501 |
|
| 1502 | void rt_mutex_destroy(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 1503 | {
|
| 1504 | WARN_ON(rt_mutex_is_locked(lock));
|
| 1505 | #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES
|
| 1506 | lock->magic = NULL;
|
| 1507 | #endif
|
| 1508 | }
|
| 1509 |
|
| 1510 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_destroy);
|
| 1511 |
|
| 1512 | |
| 1513 | * __rt_mutex_init - initialize the rt lock
|
| 1514 | *
|
| 1515 | * @lock: the rt lock to be initialized
|
| 1516 | *
|
| 1517 | * Initialize the rt lock to unlocked state.
|
| 1518 | *
|
| 1519 | * Initializing of a locked rt lock is not allowed
|
| 1520 |
|
| 1521 | void __rt_mutex_init(struct rt_mutex *lock, const char *name)
|
| 1522 | {
|
| 1523 | lock->owner = NULL;
|
| 1524 | raw_spin_lock_init(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1525 | lock->waiters = RB_ROOT;
|
| 1526 | lock->waiters_leftmost = NULL;
|
| 1527 |
|
| 1528 | debug_rt_mutex_init(lock, name);
|
| 1529 | }
|
| 1530 | EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rt_mutex_init);
|
| 1531 |
|
| 1532 | |
| 1533 | * rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked - initialize and lock a rt_mutex on behalf of a
|
| 1534 | * proxy owner
|
| 1535 | *
|
| 1536 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 1537 | * @proxy_owner:the task to set as owner
|
| 1538 | *
|
| 1539 | * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself
|
| 1540 | * Special API call for PI-futex support
|
| 1541 |
|
| 1542 | void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1543 | struct task_struct *proxy_owner)
|
| 1544 | {
|
| 1545 | __rt_mutex_init(lock, NULL);
|
| 1546 | debug_rt_mutex_proxy_lock(lock, proxy_owner);
|
| 1547 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, proxy_owner);
|
| 1548 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, proxy_owner);
|
| 1549 | }
|
| 1550 |
|
| 1551 | |
| 1552 | * rt_mutex_proxy_unlock - release a lock on behalf of owner
|
| 1553 | *
|
| 1554 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to be locked
|
| 1555 | *
|
| 1556 | * No locking. Caller has to do serializing itself
|
| 1557 | * Special API call for PI-futex support
|
| 1558 |
|
| 1559 | void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1560 | struct task_struct *proxy_owner)
|
| 1561 | {
|
| 1562 | debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock);
|
| 1563 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
|
| 1564 | rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(proxy_owner);
|
| 1565 | }
|
| 1566 |
|
| 1567 | |
| 1568 | * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
|
| 1569 | * @lock: the rt_mutex to take
|
| 1570 | * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
|
| 1571 | * @task: the task to prepare
|
| 1572 | *
|
| 1573 | * Returns:
|
| 1574 | * 0 - task blocked on lock
|
| 1575 | * 1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
|
| 1576 | * <0 - error
|
| 1577 | *
|
| 1578 | * Special API call for FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI support.
|
| 1579 |
|
| 1580 | int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1581 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
|
| 1582 | struct task_struct *task)
|
| 1583 | {
|
| 1584 | int ret;
|
| 1585 |
|
| 1586 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1587 |
|
| 1588 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL)) {
|
| 1589 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1590 | return 1;
|
| 1591 | }
|
| 1592 |
|
| 1593 |
|
| 1594 | ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task,
|
| 1595 | RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK);
|
| 1596 |
|
| 1597 | if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
|
| 1598 | |
| 1599 | * Reset the return value. We might have
|
| 1600 | * returned with -EDEADLK and the owner
|
| 1601 | * released the lock while we were walking the
|
| 1602 | * pi chain. Let the waiter sort it out.
|
| 1603 |
|
| 1604 | ret = 0;
|
| 1605 | }
|
| 1606 |
|
| 1607 | if (unlikely(ret))
|
| 1608 | remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
|
| 1609 |
|
| 1610 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1611 |
|
| 1612 | debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter);
|
| 1613 |
|
| 1614 | return ret;
|
| 1615 | }
|
| 1616 |
|
| 1617 | |
| 1618 | * rt_mutex_next_owner - return the next owner of the lock
|
| 1619 | *
|
| 1620 | * @lock: the rt lock query
|
| 1621 | *
|
| 1622 | * Returns the next owner of the lock or NULL
|
| 1623 | *
|
| 1624 | * Caller has to serialize against other accessors to the lock
|
| 1625 | * itself.
|
| 1626 | *
|
| 1627 | * Special API call for PI-futex support
|
| 1628 |
|
| 1629 | struct task_struct *rt_mutex_next_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
| 1630 | {
|
| 1631 | if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
|
| 1632 | return NULL;
|
| 1633 |
|
| 1634 | return rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->task;
|
| 1635 | }
|
| 1636 |
|
| 1637 | |
| 1638 | * rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() - Complete lock acquisition
|
| 1639 | * @lock: the rt_mutex we were woken on
|
| 1640 | * @to: the timeout, null if none. hrtimer should already have
|
| 1641 | * been started.
|
| 1642 | * @waiter: the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
|
| 1643 | *
|
| 1644 | * Complete the lock acquisition started our behalf by another thread.
|
| 1645 | *
|
| 1646 | * Returns:
|
| 1647 | * 0 - success
|
| 1648 | * <0 - error, one of -EINTR, -ETIMEDOUT
|
| 1649 | *
|
| 1650 | * Special API call for PI-futex requeue support
|
| 1651 |
|
| 1652 | int rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
| 1653 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *to,
|
| 1654 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
|
| 1655 | {
|
| 1656 | int ret;
|
| 1657 |
|
| 1658 | raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1659 |
|
| 1660 | set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
| 1661 |
|
| 1662 |
|
| 1663 | ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, to, waiter);
|
| 1664 |
|
| 1665 | if (unlikely(ret))
|
| 1666 | remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
|
| 1667 |
|
| 1668 | |
| 1669 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
|
| 1670 | * have to fix that up.
|
| 1671 |
|
| 1672 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
| 1673 |
|
| 1674 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
| 1675 |
|
| 1676 | return ret;
|
| 1677 | }
|