| 1 | |
| 2 |
|
| 3 | #include <linux/plist.h>
|
| 4 | #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 | #include "futex.h"
|
| 7 | #include "../locking/rtmutex_common.h"
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 | |
| 10 | * On PREEMPT_RT, the hash bucket lock is a 'sleeping' spinlock with an
|
| 11 | * underlying rtmutex. The task which is about to be requeued could have
|
| 12 | * just woken up (timeout, signal). After the wake up the task has to
|
| 13 | * acquire hash bucket lock, which is held by the requeue code. As a task
|
| 14 | * can only be blocked on _ONE_ rtmutex at a time, the proxy lock blocking
|
| 15 | * and the hash bucket lock blocking would collide and corrupt state.
|
| 16 | *
|
| 17 | * On !PREEMPT_RT this is not a problem and everything could be serialized
|
| 18 | * on hash bucket lock, but aside of having the benefit of common code,
|
| 19 | * this allows to avoid doing the requeue when the task is already on the
|
| 20 | * way out and taking the hash bucket lock of the original uaddr1 when the
|
| 21 | * requeue has been completed.
|
| 22 | *
|
| 23 | * The following state transitions are valid:
|
| 24 | *
|
| 25 | * On the waiter side:
|
| 26 | * Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE
|
| 27 | * Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT
|
| 28 | *
|
| 29 | * On the requeue side:
|
| 30 | * Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_INPROGRESS
|
| 31 | * Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE/LOCKED
|
| 32 | * Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE (requeue failed)
|
| 33 | * Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE/LOCKED
|
| 34 | * Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE (requeue failed)
|
| 35 | *
|
| 36 | * The requeue side ignores a waiter with state Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE as this
|
| 37 | * signals that the waiter is already on the way out. It also means that
|
| 38 | * the waiter is still on the 'wait' futex, i.e. uaddr1.
|
| 39 | *
|
| 40 | * The waiter side signals early wakeup to the requeue side either through
|
| 41 | * setting state to Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE or to Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT depending
|
| 42 | * on the current state. In case of Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE it can immediately
|
| 43 | * proceed to take the hash bucket lock of uaddr1. If it set state to WAIT,
|
| 44 | * which means the wakeup is interleaving with a requeue in progress it has
|
| 45 | * to wait for the requeue side to change the state. Either to DONE/LOCKED
|
| 46 | * or to IGNORE. DONE/LOCKED means the waiter q is now on the uaddr2 futex
|
| 47 | * and either blocked (DONE) or has acquired it (LOCKED). IGNORE is set by
|
| 48 | * the requeue side when the requeue attempt failed via deadlock detection
|
| 49 | * and therefore the waiter q is still on the uaddr1 futex.
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 | enum {
|
| 52 | Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE = 0,
|
| 53 | Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE,
|
| 54 | Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS,
|
| 55 | Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT,
|
| 56 | Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE,
|
| 57 | Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED,
|
| 58 | };
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 | const struct futex_q futex_q_init = {
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 | .wake = futex_wake_mark,
|
| 63 | .key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT,
|
| 64 | .bitset = FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY,
|
| 65 | .requeue_state = ATOMIC_INIT(Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE),
|
| 66 | };
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 | |
| 69 | * requeue_futex() - Requeue a futex_q from one hb to another
|
| 70 | * @q: the futex_q to requeue
|
| 71 | * @hb1: the source hash_bucket
|
| 72 | * @hb2: the target hash_bucket
|
| 73 | * @key2: the new key for the requeued futex_q
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 | static inline
|
| 76 | void requeue_futex(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1,
|
| 77 | struct futex_hash_bucket *hb2, union futex_key *key2)
|
| 78 | {
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 | |
| 81 | * If key1 and key2 hash to the same bucket, no need to
|
| 82 | * requeue.
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 | if (likely(&hb1->chain != &hb2->chain)) {
|
| 85 | plist_del(&q->list, &hb1->chain);
|
| 86 | futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb1);
|
| 87 | futex_hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
|
| 88 | plist_add(&q->list, &hb2->chain);
|
| 89 | q->lock_ptr = &hb2->lock;
|
| 90 | |
| 91 | * hb1 and hb2 belong to the same futex_hash_bucket_private
|
| 92 | * because if we managed get a reference on hb1 then it can't be
|
| 93 | * replaced. Therefore we avoid put(hb1)+get(hb2) here.
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 | }
|
| 96 | q->key = *key2;
|
| 97 | }
|
| 98 |
|
| 99 | static inline bool futex_requeue_pi_prepare(struct futex_q *q,
|
| 100 | struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
|
| 101 | {
|
| 102 | int old, new;
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 | |
| 105 | * Set state to Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS unless an early wakeup has
|
| 106 | * already set Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE to signal that requeue should
|
| 107 | * ignore the waiter.
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 | old = atomic_read_acquire(&q->requeue_state);
|
| 110 | do {
|
| 111 | if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE)
|
| 112 | return false;
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 | |
| 115 | * futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() might have set it to
|
| 116 | * IN_PROGRESS and a interleaved early wake to WAIT.
|
| 117 | *
|
| 118 | * It was considered to have an extra state for that
|
| 119 | * trylock, but that would just add more conditionals
|
| 120 | * all over the place for a dubious value.
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 | if (old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE)
|
| 123 | break;
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 | new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS;
|
| 126 | } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
|
| 127 |
|
| 128 | q->pi_state = pi_state;
|
| 129 | return true;
|
| 130 | }
|
| 131 |
|
| 132 | static inline void futex_requeue_pi_complete(struct futex_q *q, int locked)
|
| 133 | {
|
| 134 | int old, new;
|
| 135 |
|
| 136 | old = atomic_read_acquire(&q->requeue_state);
|
| 137 | do {
|
| 138 | if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE)
|
| 139 | return;
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 | if (locked >= 0) {
|
| 142 |
|
| 143 | WARN_ON_ONCE(old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS &&
|
| 144 | old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT);
|
| 145 | new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE + locked;
|
| 146 | } else if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
|
| 147 |
|
| 148 | new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE;
|
| 149 | } else {
|
| 150 |
|
| 151 | WARN_ON_ONCE(old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT);
|
| 152 | new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE;
|
| 153 | }
|
| 154 | } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
|
| 155 |
|
| 156 | #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 | if (unlikely(old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT))
|
| 159 | rcuwait_wake_up(&q->requeue_wait);
|
| 160 | #endif
|
| 161 | }
|
| 162 |
|
| 163 | static inline int futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync(struct futex_q *q)
|
| 164 | {
|
| 165 | int old, new;
|
| 166 |
|
| 167 | old = atomic_read_acquire(&q->requeue_state);
|
| 168 | do {
|
| 169 |
|
| 170 | if (old >= Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE)
|
| 171 | return old;
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 | |
| 174 | * If not done, then tell the requeue code to either ignore
|
| 175 | * the waiter or to wake it up once the requeue is done.
|
| 176 |
|
| 177 | new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT;
|
| 178 | if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE)
|
| 179 | new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE;
|
| 180 | } while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
|
| 181 |
|
| 182 |
|
| 183 | if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
|
| 184 | #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
|
| 185 | rcuwait_wait_event(&q->requeue_wait,
|
| 186 | atomic_read(&q->requeue_state) != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT,
|
| 187 | TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
| 188 | #else
|
| 189 | (void)atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&q->requeue_state, VAL != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT);
|
| 190 | #endif
|
| 191 | }
|
| 192 |
|
| 193 | |
| 194 | * Requeue is now either prohibited or complete. Reread state
|
| 195 | * because during the wait above it might have changed. Nothing
|
| 196 | * will modify q->requeue_state after this point.
|
| 197 |
|
| 198 | return atomic_read(&q->requeue_state);
|
| 199 | }
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 | |
| 202 | * requeue_pi_wake_futex() - Wake a task that acquired the lock during requeue
|
| 203 | * @q: the futex_q
|
| 204 | * @key: the key of the requeue target futex
|
| 205 | * @hb: the hash_bucket of the requeue target futex
|
| 206 | *
|
| 207 | * During futex_requeue, with requeue_pi=1, it is possible to acquire the
|
| 208 | * target futex if it is uncontended or via a lock steal.
|
| 209 | *
|
| 210 | * 1) Set @q::key to the requeue target futex key so the waiter can detect
|
| 211 | * the wakeup on the right futex.
|
| 212 | *
|
| 213 | * 2) Dequeue @q from the hash bucket.
|
| 214 | *
|
| 215 | * 3) Set @q::rt_waiter to NULL so the woken up task can detect atomic lock
|
| 216 | * acquisition.
|
| 217 | *
|
| 218 | * 4) Set the q->lock_ptr to the requeue target hb->lock for the case that
|
| 219 | * the waiter has to fixup the pi state.
|
| 220 | *
|
| 221 | * 5) Complete the requeue state so the waiter can make progress. After
|
| 222 | * this point the waiter task can return from the syscall immediately in
|
| 223 | * case that the pi state does not have to be fixed up.
|
| 224 | *
|
| 225 | * 6) Wake the waiter task.
|
| 226 | *
|
| 227 | * Must be called with both q->lock_ptr and hb->lock held.
|
| 228 |
|
| 229 | static inline
|
| 230 | void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key,
|
| 231 | struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
|
| 232 | {
|
| 233 | struct task_struct *task;
|
| 234 |
|
| 235 | q->key = *key;
|
| 236 | __futex_unqueue(q);
|
| 237 |
|
| 238 | WARN_ON(!q->rt_waiter);
|
| 239 | q->rt_waiter = NULL;
|
| 240 | |
| 241 | * Acquire a reference for the waiter to ensure valid
|
| 242 | * futex_q::lock_ptr.
|
| 243 |
|
| 244 | if (futex_key_is_private(key))
|
| 245 | q->drop_fph = futex_private_hash(key->private.mm);
|
| 246 | q->lock_ptr = &hb->lock;
|
| 247 | task = READ_ONCE(q->task);
|
| 248 |
|
| 249 |
|
| 250 | futex_requeue_pi_complete(q, 1);
|
| 251 | wake_up_state(task, TASK_NORMAL);
|
| 252 | }
|
| 253 |
|
| 254 | |
| 255 | * futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() - Attempt an atomic lock for the top waiter
|
| 256 | * @pifutex: the user address of the to futex
|
| 257 | * @hb1: the from futex hash bucket, must be locked by the caller
|
| 258 | * @hb2: the to futex hash bucket, must be locked by the caller
|
| 259 | * @key1: the from futex key
|
| 260 | * @key2: the to futex key
|
| 261 | * @ps: address to store the pi_state pointer
|
| 262 | * @exiting: Pointer to store the task pointer of the owner task
|
| 263 | * which is in the middle of exiting
|
| 264 | * @set_waiters: force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit (1) or not (0)
|
| 265 | *
|
| 266 | * Try and get the lock on behalf of the top waiter if we can do it atomically.
|
| 267 | * Wake the top waiter if we succeed. If the caller specified set_waiters,
|
| 268 | * then direct futex_lock_pi_atomic() to force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit.
|
| 269 | * hb1 and hb2 must be held by the caller.
|
| 270 | *
|
| 271 | * @exiting is only set when the return value is -EBUSY. If so, this holds
|
| 272 | * a refcount on the exiting task on return and the caller needs to drop it
|
| 273 | * after waiting for the exit to complete.
|
| 274 | *
|
| 275 | * Return:
|
| 276 | * - 0 - failed to acquire the lock atomically;
|
| 277 | * - >0 - acquired the lock, return value is vpid of the top_waiter
|
| 278 | * - <0 - error
|
| 279 |
|
| 280 | static int
|
| 281 | futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1,
|
| 282 | struct futex_hash_bucket *hb2, union futex_key *key1,
|
| 283 | union futex_key *key2, struct futex_pi_state **ps,
|
| 284 | struct task_struct **exiting, int set_waiters)
|
| 285 | {
|
| 286 | struct futex_q *top_waiter;
|
| 287 | u32 curval;
|
| 288 | int ret;
|
| 289 |
|
| 290 | if (futex_get_value_locked(&curval, pifutex))
|
| 291 | return -EFAULT;
|
| 292 |
|
| 293 | if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true)))
|
| 294 | return -EFAULT;
|
| 295 |
|
| 296 | |
| 297 | * Find the top_waiter and determine if there are additional waiters.
|
| 298 | * If the caller intends to requeue more than 1 waiter to pifutex,
|
| 299 | * force futex_lock_pi_atomic() to set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit now,
|
| 300 | * as we have means to handle the possible fault. If not, don't set
|
| 301 | * the bit unnecessarily as it will force the subsequent unlock to enter
|
| 302 | * the kernel.
|
| 303 |
|
| 304 | top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb1, key1);
|
| 305 |
|
| 306 |
|
| 307 | if (!top_waiter)
|
| 308 | return 0;
|
| 309 |
|
| 310 | |
| 311 | * Ensure that this is a waiter sitting in futex_wait_requeue_pi()
|
| 312 | * and waiting on the 'waitqueue' futex which is always !PI.
|
| 313 |
|
| 314 | if (!top_waiter->rt_waiter || top_waiter->pi_state)
|
| 315 | return -EINVAL;
|
| 316 |
|
| 317 |
|
| 318 | if (!futex_match(top_waiter->requeue_pi_key, key2))
|
| 319 | return -EINVAL;
|
| 320 |
|
| 321 |
|
| 322 | if (!futex_requeue_pi_prepare(top_waiter, NULL)) {
|
| 323 | plist_del(&top_waiter->list, &hb1->chain);
|
| 324 | futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb1);
|
| 325 | return -EAGAIN;
|
| 326 | }
|
| 327 |
|
| 328 | |
| 329 | * Try to take the lock for top_waiter and set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit
|
| 330 | * in the contended case or if @set_waiters is true.
|
| 331 | *
|
| 332 | * In the contended case PI state is attached to the lock owner. If
|
| 333 | * the user space lock can be acquired then PI state is attached to
|
| 334 | * the new owner (@top_waiter->task) when @set_waiters is true.
|
| 335 |
|
| 336 | ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(pifutex, hb2, key2, ps, top_waiter->task,
|
| 337 | exiting, set_waiters);
|
| 338 | if (ret == 1) {
|
| 339 | |
| 340 | * Lock was acquired in user space and PI state was
|
| 341 | * attached to @top_waiter->task. That means state is fully
|
| 342 | * consistent and the waiter can return to user space
|
| 343 | * immediately after the wakeup.
|
| 344 |
|
| 345 | requeue_pi_wake_futex(top_waiter, key2, hb2);
|
| 346 | } else if (ret < 0) {
|
| 347 |
|
| 348 | futex_requeue_pi_complete(top_waiter, ret);
|
| 349 | } else {
|
| 350 | |
| 351 | * futex_lock_pi_atomic() did not acquire the user space
|
| 352 | * futex, but managed to establish the proxy lock and pi
|
| 353 | * state. top_waiter::requeue_state cannot be fixed up here
|
| 354 | * because the waiter is not enqueued on the rtmutex
|
| 355 | * yet. This is handled at the callsite depending on the
|
| 356 | * result of rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() which is
|
| 357 | * guaranteed to be reached with this function returning 0.
|
| 358 |
|
| 359 | }
|
| 360 | return ret;
|
| 361 | }
|
| 362 |
|
| 363 | |
| 364 | * futex_requeue() - Requeue waiters from uaddr1 to uaddr2
|
| 365 | * @uaddr1: source futex user address
|
| 366 | * @flags1: futex flags (FLAGS_SHARED, etc.)
|
| 367 | * @uaddr2: target futex user address
|
| 368 | * @flags2: futex flags (FLAGS_SHARED, etc.)
|
| 369 | * @nr_wake: number of waiters to wake (must be 1 for requeue_pi)
|
| 370 | * @nr_requeue: number of waiters to requeue (0-INT_MAX)
|
| 371 | * @cmpval: @uaddr1 expected value (or %NULL)
|
| 372 | * @requeue_pi: if we are attempting to requeue from a non-pi futex to a
|
| 373 | * pi futex (pi to pi requeue is not supported)
|
| 374 | *
|
| 375 | * Requeue waiters on uaddr1 to uaddr2. In the requeue_pi case, try to acquire
|
| 376 | * uaddr2 atomically on behalf of the top waiter.
|
| 377 | *
|
| 378 | * Return:
|
| 379 | * - >=0 - on success, the number of tasks requeued or woken;
|
| 380 | * - <0 - on error
|
| 381 |
|
| 382 | int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags1,
|
| 383 | u32 __user *uaddr2, unsigned int flags2,
|
| 384 | int nr_wake, int nr_requeue, u32 *cmpval, int requeue_pi)
|
| 385 | {
|
| 386 | union futex_key key1 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT, key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
|
| 387 | int task_count = 0, ret;
|
| 388 | struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = NULL;
|
| 389 | struct futex_q *this, *next;
|
| 390 | DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
|
| 391 |
|
| 392 | if (nr_wake < 0 || nr_requeue < 0)
|
| 393 | return -EINVAL;
|
| 394 |
|
| 395 | |
| 396 | * When PI not supported: return -ENOSYS if requeue_pi is true,
|
| 397 | * consequently the compiler knows requeue_pi is always false past
|
| 398 | * this point which will optimize away all the conditional code
|
| 399 | * further down.
|
| 400 |
|
| 401 | if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI) && requeue_pi)
|
| 402 | return -ENOSYS;
|
| 403 |
|
| 404 | if (requeue_pi) {
|
| 405 | |
| 406 | * Requeue PI only works on two distinct uaddrs. This
|
| 407 | * check is only valid for private futexes. See below.
|
| 408 |
|
| 409 | if (uaddr1 == uaddr2)
|
| 410 | return -EINVAL;
|
| 411 |
|
| 412 | |
| 413 | * futex_requeue() allows the caller to define the number
|
| 414 | * of waiters to wake up via the @nr_wake argument. With
|
| 415 | * REQUEUE_PI, waking up more than one waiter is creating
|
| 416 | * more problems than it solves. Waking up a waiter makes
|
| 417 | * only sense if the PI futex @uaddr2 is uncontended as
|
| 418 | * this allows the requeue code to acquire the futex
|
| 419 | * @uaddr2 before waking the waiter. The waiter can then
|
| 420 | * return to user space without further action. A secondary
|
| 421 | * wakeup would just make the futex_wait_requeue_pi()
|
| 422 | * handling more complex, because that code would have to
|
| 423 | * look up pi_state and do more or less all the handling
|
| 424 | * which the requeue code has to do for the to be requeued
|
| 425 | * waiters. So restrict the number of waiters to wake to
|
| 426 | * one, and only wake it up when the PI futex is
|
| 427 | * uncontended. Otherwise requeue it and let the unlock of
|
| 428 | * the PI futex handle the wakeup.
|
| 429 | *
|
| 430 | * All REQUEUE_PI users, e.g. pthread_cond_signal() and
|
| 431 | * pthread_cond_broadcast() must use nr_wake=1.
|
| 432 |
|
| 433 | if (nr_wake != 1)
|
| 434 | return -EINVAL;
|
| 435 |
|
| 436 | |
| 437 | * requeue_pi requires a pi_state, try to allocate it now
|
| 438 | * without any locks in case it fails.
|
| 439 |
|
| 440 | if (refill_pi_state_cache())
|
| 441 | return -ENOMEM;
|
| 442 | }
|
| 443 |
|
| 444 | retry:
|
| 445 | ret = get_futex_key(uaddr1, flags1, &key1, FUTEX_READ);
|
| 446 | if (unlikely(ret != 0))
|
| 447 | return ret;
|
| 448 | ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, flags2, &key2,
|
| 449 | requeue_pi ? FUTEX_WRITE : FUTEX_READ);
|
| 450 | if (unlikely(ret != 0))
|
| 451 | return ret;
|
| 452 |
|
| 453 | |
| 454 | * The check above which compares uaddrs is not sufficient for
|
| 455 | * shared futexes. We need to compare the keys:
|
| 456 |
|
| 457 | if (requeue_pi && futex_match(&key1, &key2))
|
| 458 | return -EINVAL;
|
| 459 |
|
| 460 | retry_private:
|
| 461 | if (1) {
|
| 462 | CLASS(hbr, hbr1)(&key1);
|
| 463 | CLASS(hbr, hbr2)(&key2);
|
| 464 | auto hb1 = hbr1.hb;
|
| 465 | auto hb2 = hbr2.hb;
|
| 466 |
|
| 467 | futex_hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
|
| 468 | double_lock_hb(hb1, hb2);
|
| 469 |
|
| 470 | if (likely(cmpval != NULL)) {
|
| 471 | u32 curval;
|
| 472 |
|
| 473 | ret = futex_get_value_locked(&curval, uaddr1);
|
| 474 |
|
| 475 | if (unlikely(ret)) {
|
| 476 | futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
|
| 477 | double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
|
| 478 |
|
| 479 | ret = get_user(curval, uaddr1);
|
| 480 | if (ret)
|
| 481 | return ret;
|
| 482 |
|
| 483 | if (!(flags1 & FLAGS_SHARED))
|
| 484 | goto retry_private;
|
| 485 |
|
| 486 | goto retry;
|
| 487 | }
|
| 488 | if (curval != *cmpval) {
|
| 489 | ret = -EAGAIN;
|
| 490 | goto out_unlock;
|
| 491 | }
|
| 492 | }
|
| 493 |
|
| 494 | if (requeue_pi) {
|
| 495 | struct task_struct *exiting = NULL;
|
| 496 |
|
| 497 | |
| 498 | * Attempt to acquire uaddr2 and wake the top waiter. If we
|
| 499 | * intend to requeue waiters, force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS
|
| 500 | * bit. We force this here where we are able to easily handle
|
| 501 | * faults rather in the requeue loop below.
|
| 502 | *
|
| 503 | * Updates topwaiter::requeue_state if a top waiter exists.
|
| 504 |
|
| 505 | ret = futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(uaddr2, hb1, hb2, &key1,
|
| 506 | &key2, &pi_state,
|
| 507 | &exiting, nr_requeue);
|
| 508 |
|
| 509 | |
| 510 | * At this point the top_waiter has either taken uaddr2 or
|
| 511 | * is waiting on it. In both cases pi_state has been
|
| 512 | * established and an initial refcount on it. In case of an
|
| 513 | * error there's nothing.
|
| 514 | *
|
| 515 | * The top waiter's requeue_state is up to date:
|
| 516 | *
|
| 517 | * - If the lock was acquired atomically (ret == 1), then
|
| 518 | * the state is Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED.
|
| 519 | *
|
| 520 | * The top waiter has been dequeued and woken up and can
|
| 521 | * return to user space immediately. The kernel/user
|
| 522 | * space state is consistent. In case that there must be
|
| 523 | * more waiters requeued the WAITERS bit in the user
|
| 524 | * space futex is set so the top waiter task has to go
|
| 525 | * into the syscall slowpath to unlock the futex. This
|
| 526 | * will block until this requeue operation has been
|
| 527 | * completed and the hash bucket locks have been
|
| 528 | * dropped.
|
| 529 | *
|
| 530 | * - If the trylock failed with an error (ret < 0) then
|
| 531 | * the state is either Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE, i.e. "nothing
|
| 532 | * happened", or Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE when there was an
|
| 533 | * interleaved early wakeup.
|
| 534 | *
|
| 535 | * - If the trylock did not succeed (ret == 0) then the
|
| 536 | * state is either Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS or
|
| 537 | * Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT if an early wakeup interleaved.
|
| 538 | * This will be cleaned up in the loop below, which
|
| 539 | * cannot fail because futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() did
|
| 540 | * the same sanity checks for requeue_pi as the loop
|
| 541 | * below does.
|
| 542 |
|
| 543 | switch (ret) {
|
| 544 | case 0:
|
| 545 |
|
| 546 | break;
|
| 547 |
|
| 548 | case 1:
|
| 549 | |
| 550 | * futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() acquired the user space
|
| 551 | * futex. Adjust task_count.
|
| 552 |
|
| 553 | task_count++;
|
| 554 | ret = 0;
|
| 555 | break;
|
| 556 |
|
| 557 | |
| 558 | * If the above failed, then pi_state is NULL and
|
| 559 | * waiter::requeue_state is correct.
|
| 560 |
|
| 561 | case -EFAULT:
|
| 562 | futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
|
| 563 | double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
|
| 564 | ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr2);
|
| 565 | if (!ret)
|
| 566 | goto retry;
|
| 567 | return ret;
|
| 568 | case -EBUSY:
|
| 569 | case -EAGAIN:
|
| 570 | |
| 571 | * Two reasons for this:
|
| 572 | * - EBUSY: Owner is exiting and we just wait for the
|
| 573 | * exit to complete.
|
| 574 | * - EAGAIN: The user space value changed.
|
| 575 |
|
| 576 | futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
|
| 577 | double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
|
| 578 | |
| 579 | * Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of
|
| 580 | * exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise
|
| 581 | * this task might loop forever, aka. live lock.
|
| 582 |
|
| 583 | wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting);
|
| 584 | cond_resched();
|
| 585 | goto retry;
|
| 586 | default:
|
| 587 | goto out_unlock;
|
| 588 | }
|
| 589 | }
|
| 590 |
|
| 591 | plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb1->chain, list) {
|
| 592 | if (task_count - nr_wake >= nr_requeue)
|
| 593 | break;
|
| 594 |
|
| 595 | if (!futex_match(&this->key, &key1))
|
| 596 | continue;
|
| 597 |
|
| 598 | |
| 599 | * FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI should always
|
| 600 | * be paired with each other and no other futex ops.
|
| 601 | *
|
| 602 | * We should never be requeueing a futex_q with a pi_state,
|
| 603 | * which is awaiting a futex_unlock_pi().
|
| 604 |
|
| 605 | if ((requeue_pi && !this->rt_waiter) ||
|
| 606 | (!requeue_pi && this->rt_waiter) ||
|
| 607 | this->pi_state) {
|
| 608 | ret = -EINVAL;
|
| 609 | break;
|
| 610 | }
|
| 611 |
|
| 612 |
|
| 613 | if (!requeue_pi) {
|
| 614 | if (++task_count <= nr_wake)
|
| 615 | this->wake(&wake_q, this);
|
| 616 | else
|
| 617 | requeue_futex(this, hb1, hb2, &key2);
|
| 618 | continue;
|
| 619 | }
|
| 620 |
|
| 621 |
|
| 622 | if (!futex_match(this->requeue_pi_key, &key2)) {
|
| 623 | ret = -EINVAL;
|
| 624 | break;
|
| 625 | }
|
| 626 |
|
| 627 | |
| 628 | * Requeue nr_requeue waiters and possibly one more in the case
|
| 629 | * of requeue_pi if we couldn't acquire the lock atomically.
|
| 630 | *
|
| 631 | * Prepare the waiter to take the rt_mutex. Take a refcount
|
| 632 | * on the pi_state and store the pointer in the futex_q
|
| 633 | * object of the waiter.
|
| 634 |
|
| 635 | get_pi_state(pi_state);
|
| 636 |
|
| 637 |
|
| 638 | if (!futex_requeue_pi_prepare(this, pi_state)) {
|
| 639 | |
| 640 | * Early woken waiter signaled that it is on the
|
| 641 | * way out. Drop the pi_state reference and try the
|
| 642 | * next waiter. @this->pi_state is still NULL.
|
| 643 |
|
| 644 | put_pi_state(pi_state);
|
| 645 | continue;
|
| 646 | }
|
| 647 |
|
| 648 | ret = rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex,
|
| 649 | this->rt_waiter,
|
| 650 | this->task);
|
| 651 |
|
| 652 | if (ret == 1) {
|
| 653 | |
| 654 | * We got the lock. We do neither drop the refcount
|
| 655 | * on pi_state nor clear this->pi_state because the
|
| 656 | * waiter needs the pi_state for cleaning up the
|
| 657 | * user space value. It will drop the refcount
|
| 658 | * after doing so. this::requeue_state is updated
|
| 659 | * in the wakeup as well.
|
| 660 |
|
| 661 | requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2);
|
| 662 | task_count++;
|
| 663 | } else if (!ret) {
|
| 664 |
|
| 665 | requeue_futex(this, hb1, hb2, &key2);
|
| 666 | futex_requeue_pi_complete(this, 0);
|
| 667 | task_count++;
|
| 668 | } else {
|
| 669 | |
| 670 | * rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() detected a potential
|
| 671 | * deadlock when we tried to queue that waiter.
|
| 672 | * Drop the pi_state reference which we took above
|
| 673 | * and remove the pointer to the state from the
|
| 674 | * waiters futex_q object.
|
| 675 |
|
| 676 | this->pi_state = NULL;
|
| 677 | put_pi_state(pi_state);
|
| 678 | futex_requeue_pi_complete(this, ret);
|
| 679 | |
| 680 | * We stop queueing more waiters and let user space
|
| 681 | * deal with the mess.
|
| 682 |
|
| 683 | break;
|
| 684 | }
|
| 685 | }
|
| 686 |
|
| 687 | |
| 688 | * We took an extra initial reference to the pi_state in
|
| 689 | * futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(). We need to drop it here again.
|
| 690 |
|
| 691 | put_pi_state(pi_state);
|
| 692 |
|
| 693 | out_unlock:
|
| 694 | futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
|
| 695 | double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
|
| 696 | }
|
| 697 | wake_up_q(&wake_q);
|
| 698 | return ret ? ret : task_count;
|
| 699 | }
|
| 700 |
|
| 701 | |
| 702 | * handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup() - Handle early wakeup on the initial futex
|
| 703 | * @hb: the hash_bucket futex_q was original enqueued on
|
| 704 | * @q: the futex_q woken while waiting to be requeued
|
| 705 | * @timeout: the timeout associated with the wait (NULL if none)
|
| 706 | *
|
| 707 | * Determine the cause for the early wakeup.
|
| 708 | *
|
| 709 | * Return:
|
| 710 | * -EWOULDBLOCK or -ETIMEDOUT or -ERESTARTNOINTR
|
| 711 |
|
| 712 | static inline
|
| 713 | int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
|
| 714 | struct futex_q *q,
|
| 715 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
|
| 716 | {
|
| 717 | int ret;
|
| 718 |
|
| 719 | |
| 720 | * With the hb lock held, we avoid races while we process the wakeup.
|
| 721 | * We only need to hold hb (and not hb2) to ensure atomicity as the
|
| 722 | * wakeup code can't change q.key from uaddr to uaddr2 if we hold hb.
|
| 723 | * It can't be requeued from uaddr2 to something else since we don't
|
| 724 | * support a PI aware source futex for requeue.
|
| 725 |
|
| 726 | WARN_ON_ONCE(&hb->lock != q->lock_ptr);
|
| 727 |
|
| 728 | |
| 729 | * We were woken prior to requeue by a timeout or a signal.
|
| 730 | * Conditionally unqueue the futex_q and determine which it was.
|
| 731 |
|
| 732 | if (!plist_node_empty(&q->list)) {
|
| 733 | plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
|
| 734 | futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb);
|
| 735 | }
|
| 736 |
|
| 737 |
|
| 738 | ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
|
| 739 | if (timeout && !timeout->task)
|
| 740 | ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
|
| 741 | else if (signal_pending(current))
|
| 742 | ret = -ERESTARTNOINTR;
|
| 743 | return ret;
|
| 744 | }
|
| 745 |
|
| 746 | |
| 747 | * futex_wait_requeue_pi() - Wait on uaddr and take uaddr2
|
| 748 | * @uaddr: the futex we initially wait on (non-pi)
|
| 749 | * @flags: futex flags (FLAGS_SHARED, FLAGS_CLOCKRT, etc.), they must be
|
| 750 | * the same type, no requeueing from private to shared, etc.
|
| 751 | * @val: the expected value of uaddr
|
| 752 | * @abs_time: absolute timeout
|
| 753 | * @bitset: 32 bit wakeup bitset set by userspace, defaults to all
|
| 754 | * @uaddr2: the pi futex we will take prior to returning to user-space
|
| 755 | *
|
| 756 | * The caller will wait on uaddr and will be requeued by futex_requeue() to
|
| 757 | * uaddr2 which must be PI aware and unique from uaddr. Normal wakeup will wake
|
| 758 | * on uaddr2 and complete the acquisition of the rt_mutex prior to returning to
|
| 759 | * userspace. This ensures the rt_mutex maintains an owner when it has waiters;
|
| 760 | * without one, the pi logic would not know which task to boost/deboost, if
|
| 761 | * there was a need to.
|
| 762 | *
|
| 763 | * We call schedule in futex_wait_queue() when we enqueue and return there
|
| 764 | * via the following--
|
| 765 | * 1) wakeup on uaddr2 after an atomic lock acquisition by futex_requeue()
|
| 766 | * 2) wakeup on uaddr2 after a requeue
|
| 767 | * 3) signal
|
| 768 | * 4) timeout
|
| 769 | *
|
| 770 | * If 3, cleanup and return -ERESTARTNOINTR.
|
| 771 | *
|
| 772 | * If 2, we may then block on trying to take the rt_mutex and return via:
|
| 773 | * 5) successful lock
|
| 774 | * 6) signal
|
| 775 | * 7) timeout
|
| 776 | * 8) other lock acquisition failure
|
| 777 | *
|
| 778 | * If 6, return -EWOULDBLOCK (restarting the syscall would do the same).
|
| 779 | *
|
| 780 | * If 4 or 7, we cleanup and return with -ETIMEDOUT.
|
| 781 | *
|
| 782 | * Return:
|
| 783 | * - 0 - On success;
|
| 784 | * - <0 - On error
|
| 785 |
|
| 786 | int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
|
| 787 | u32 val, ktime_t *abs_time, u32 bitset,
|
| 788 | u32 __user *uaddr2)
|
| 789 | {
|
| 790 | struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to;
|
| 791 | struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter;
|
| 792 | union futex_key key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
|
| 793 | struct futex_q q = futex_q_init;
|
| 794 | struct rt_mutex_base *pi_mutex;
|
| 795 | int res, ret;
|
| 796 |
|
| 797 | if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI))
|
| 798 | return -ENOSYS;
|
| 799 |
|
| 800 | if (uaddr == uaddr2)
|
| 801 | return -EINVAL;
|
| 802 |
|
| 803 | if (!bitset)
|
| 804 | return -EINVAL;
|
| 805 |
|
| 806 | to = futex_setup_timer(abs_time, &timeout, flags,
|
| 807 | current->timer_slack_ns);
|
| 808 |
|
| 809 | |
| 810 | * The waiter is allocated on our stack, manipulated by the requeue
|
| 811 | * code while we sleep on uaddr.
|
| 812 |
|
| 813 | rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter);
|
| 814 |
|
| 815 | ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, flags, &key2, FUTEX_WRITE);
|
| 816 | if (unlikely(ret != 0))
|
| 817 | goto out;
|
| 818 |
|
| 819 | q.bitset = bitset;
|
| 820 | q.rt_waiter = &rt_waiter;
|
| 821 | q.requeue_pi_key = &key2;
|
| 822 |
|
| 823 | |
| 824 | * Prepare to wait on uaddr. On success, it holds hb->lock and q
|
| 825 | * is initialized.
|
| 826 |
|
| 827 | ret = futex_wait_setup(uaddr, val, flags, &q, &key2, current);
|
| 828 | if (ret)
|
| 829 | goto out;
|
| 830 |
|
| 831 |
|
| 832 | futex_do_wait(&q, to);
|
| 833 |
|
| 834 | switch (futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync(&q)) {
|
| 835 | case Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE:
|
| 836 | {
|
| 837 | CLASS(hbr, hbr)(&q.key);
|
| 838 | auto hb = hbr.hb;
|
| 839 |
|
| 840 | spin_lock(&hb->lock);
|
| 841 | ret = handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(hb, &q, to);
|
| 842 | spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
|
| 843 | }
|
| 844 | break;
|
| 845 |
|
| 846 | case Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED:
|
| 847 |
|
| 848 | if (q.pi_state && (q.pi_state->owner != current)) {
|
| 849 | futex_q_lockptr_lock(&q);
|
| 850 | ret = fixup_pi_owner(uaddr2, &q, true);
|
| 851 | |
| 852 | * Drop the reference to the pi state which the
|
| 853 | * requeue_pi() code acquired for us.
|
| 854 |
|
| 855 | put_pi_state(q.pi_state);
|
| 856 | spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
|
| 857 | |
| 858 | * Adjust the return value. It's either -EFAULT or
|
| 859 | * success (1) but the caller expects 0 for success.
|
| 860 |
|
| 861 | ret = ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
|
| 862 | }
|
| 863 | break;
|
| 864 |
|
| 865 | case Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE:
|
| 866 |
|
| 867 | pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex;
|
| 868 | ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
|
| 869 |
|
| 870 | |
| 871 | * See futex_unlock_pi()'s cleanup: comment.
|
| 872 |
|
| 873 | if (ret && !rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, &rt_waiter))
|
| 874 | ret = 0;
|
| 875 |
|
| 876 | futex_q_lockptr_lock(&q);
|
| 877 | debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter);
|
| 878 | |
| 879 | * Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we
|
| 880 | * haven't already.
|
| 881 |
|
| 882 | res = fixup_pi_owner(uaddr2, &q, !ret);
|
| 883 | |
| 884 | * If fixup_pi_owner() returned an error, propagate that. If it
|
| 885 | * acquired the lock, clear -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR.
|
| 886 |
|
| 887 | if (res)
|
| 888 | ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0;
|
| 889 |
|
| 890 | futex_unqueue_pi(&q);
|
| 891 | spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
|
| 892 |
|
| 893 | if (ret == -EINTR) {
|
| 894 | |
| 895 | * We've already been requeued, but cannot restart
|
| 896 | * by calling futex_lock_pi() directly. We could
|
| 897 | * restart this syscall, but it would detect that
|
| 898 | * the user space "val" changed and return
|
| 899 | * -EWOULDBLOCK. Save the overhead of the restart
|
| 900 | * and return -EWOULDBLOCK directly.
|
| 901 |
|
| 902 | ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
|
| 903 | }
|
| 904 | break;
|
| 905 | default:
|
| 906 | BUG();
|
| 907 | }
|
| 908 |
|
| 909 | futex_private_hash_put(q.drop_fph);
|
| 910 |
|
| 911 | out:
|
| 912 | if (to) {
|
| 913 | hrtimer_cancel(&to->timer);
|
| 914 | destroy_hrtimer_on_stack(&to->timer);
|
| 915 | }
|
| 916 | return ret;
|
| 917 | }
|
| 918 |
|