projects/linux·commit ebe06187

epoll: fix use-after-free in eventpoll_release_file

ebe06187 · Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]> · 2014-06-17 06:58:05 +04:00

This fixes use-after-free of epi->fllink.next inside list loop macro.
This loop actually releases elements in the body.  The list is
rcu-protected but here we cannot hold rcu_read_lock because we need to
lock mutex inside.

The obvious solution is to use list_for_each_entry_safe().  RCU-ness
isn't essential because nobody can change this list under us, it's final
fput for this file.

The bug was introduced by ae10b2b4eb01 ("epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL
using rcu")

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[email protected]>
Cc: Stable <[email protected]> # 3.13+
Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Jason Baron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Commit
ebe06187bf2aec10d537ce4595e416035367d703
Parents
68986c9f

Changes

1 files changed · +2 −2

FileStatusAddDelContent
fs/eventpoll.cmodified+2−2View file

fs/eventpoll.c

View file
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index b73e062..b10b48c 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ static const struct file_operations eventpoll_fops = {
void eventpoll_release_file(struct file *file)
{
struct eventpoll *ep;
- struct epitem *epi;
+ struct epitem *epi, *next;
/*
* We don't want to get "file->f_lock" because it is not
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ void eventpoll_release_file(struct file *file)
* Besides, ep_remove() acquires the lock, so we can't hold it here.
*/
mutex_lock(&epmutex);
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(epi, &file->f_ep_links, fllink) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(epi, next, &file->f_ep_links, fllink) {
ep = epi->ep;
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, 0);
ep_remove(ep, epi);