| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | * Queued spinlock
|
| 4 | *
|
| 5 | * (C) Copyright 2013-2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
|
| 6 | * (C) Copyright 2013-2014,2018 Red Hat, Inc.
|
| 7 | * (C) Copyright 2015 Intel Corp.
|
| 8 | * (C) Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Development LP
|
| 9 | *
|
| 10 | * Authors: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
|
| 11 | * Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 | #ifndef _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 | #include <linux/smp.h>
|
| 17 | #include <linux/bug.h>
|
| 18 | #include <linux/cpumask.h>
|
| 19 | #include <linux/percpu.h>
|
| 20 | #include <linux/hardirq.h>
|
| 21 | #include <linux/mutex.h>
|
| 22 | #include <linux/prefetch.h>
|
| 23 | #include <asm/byteorder.h>
|
| 24 | #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
|
| 25 | #include <trace/events/lock.h>
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 | |
| 28 | * Include queued spinlock definitions and statistics code
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 | #include "qspinlock.h"
|
| 31 | #include "qspinlock_stat.h"
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 | |
| 34 | * The basic principle of a queue-based spinlock can best be understood
|
| 35 | * by studying a classic queue-based spinlock implementation called the
|
| 36 | * MCS lock. A copy of the original MCS lock paper ("Algorithms for Scalable
|
| 37 | * Synchronization on Shared-Memory Multiprocessors by Mellor-Crummey and
|
| 38 | * Scott") is available at
|
| 39 | *
|
| 40 | * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206115
|
| 41 | *
|
| 42 | * This queued spinlock implementation is based on the MCS lock, however to
|
| 43 | * make it fit the 4 bytes we assume spinlock_t to be, and preserve its
|
| 44 | * existing API, we must modify it somehow.
|
| 45 | *
|
| 46 | * In particular; where the traditional MCS lock consists of a tail pointer
|
| 47 | * (8 bytes) and needs the next pointer (another 8 bytes) of its own node to
|
| 48 | * unlock the next pending (next->locked), we compress both these: {tail,
|
| 49 | * next->locked} into a single u32 value.
|
| 50 | *
|
| 51 | * Since a spinlock disables recursion of its own context and there is a limit
|
| 52 | * to the contexts that can nest; namely: task, softirq, hardirq, nmi. As there
|
| 53 | * are at most 4 nesting levels, it can be encoded by a 2-bit number. Now
|
| 54 | * we can encode the tail by combining the 2-bit nesting level with the cpu
|
| 55 | * number. With one byte for the lock value and 3 bytes for the tail, only a
|
| 56 | * 32-bit word is now needed. Even though we only need 1 bit for the lock,
|
| 57 | * we extend it to a full byte to achieve better performance for architectures
|
| 58 | * that support atomic byte write.
|
| 59 | *
|
| 60 | * We also change the first spinner to spin on the lock bit instead of its
|
| 61 | * node; whereby avoiding the need to carry a node from lock to unlock, and
|
| 62 | * preserving existing lock API. This also makes the unlock code simpler and
|
| 63 | * faster.
|
| 64 | *
|
| 65 | * N.B. The current implementation only supports architectures that allow
|
| 66 | * atomic operations on smaller 8-bit and 16-bit data types.
|
| 67 | *
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 | #include "mcs_spinlock.h"
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 | |
| 73 | * Per-CPU queue node structures; we can never have more than 4 nested
|
| 74 | * contexts: task, softirq, hardirq, nmi.
|
| 75 | *
|
| 76 | * Exactly fits one 64-byte cacheline on a 64-bit architecture.
|
| 77 | *
|
| 78 | * PV doubles the storage and uses the second cacheline for PV state.
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 | static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct qnode, qnodes[_Q_MAX_NODES]);
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 | |
| 83 | * Generate the native code for queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(); provide NOPs for
|
| 84 | * all the PV callbacks.
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 | static __always_inline void __pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
|
| 88 | static __always_inline void __pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node,
|
| 89 | struct mcs_spinlock *prev) { }
|
| 90 | static __always_inline void __pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock,
|
| 91 | struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
|
| 92 | static __always_inline u32 __pv_wait_head_or_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
|
| 93 | struct mcs_spinlock *node)
|
| 94 | { return 0; }
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 | #define pv_enabled() false
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 | #define pv_init_node __pv_init_node
|
| 99 | #define pv_wait_node __pv_wait_node
|
| 100 | #define pv_kick_node __pv_kick_node
|
| 101 | #define pv_wait_head_or_lock __pv_wait_head_or_lock
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 | #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
|
| 104 | #define queued_spin_lock_slowpath native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
|
| 105 | #endif
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 | #if !defined(queued_spin_unlock) && \
|
| 108 | IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS_TRACE_CONTENDED_RELEASE)
|
| 109 | |
| 110 | * Out-of-line trace-and-release path for queued_spin_unlock(), used when
|
| 111 | * the contended_release tracepoint is enabled.
|
| 112 | *
|
| 113 | * queued_spin_release() is duplicated here on purpose: doing the release
|
| 114 | * in this function (rather than tracing here and releasing in the caller)
|
| 115 | * lets queued_spin_unlock() return right after the call, so the
|
| 116 | * tracepoint-disabled hot path never has to keep lock live across a call
|
| 117 | * in a callee-saved register. Keep this release in sync with the one in
|
| 118 | * queued_spin_unlock().
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 | void __lockfunc queued_spin_release_traced(struct qspinlock *lock)
|
| 121 | {
|
| 122 | if (queued_spin_is_contended(lock))
|
| 123 | trace_call__contended_release(lock);
|
| 124 | queued_spin_release(lock);
|
| 125 | }
|
| 126 | EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_release_traced);
|
| 127 | #endif
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 | #endif
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 | |
| 132 | * queued_spin_lock_slowpath - acquire the queued spinlock
|
| 133 | * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
|
| 134 | * @val: Current value of the queued spinlock 32-bit word
|
| 135 | *
|
| 136 | * (queue tail, pending bit, lock value)
|
| 137 | *
|
| 138 | * fast : slow : unlock
|
| 139 | * : :
|
| 140 | * uncontended (0,0,0) -:--> (0,0,1) ------------------------------:--> (*,*,0)
|
| 141 | * : | ^--------.------. / :
|
| 142 | * : v \ \ | :
|
| 143 | * pending : (0,1,1) +--> (0,1,0) \ | :
|
| 144 | * : | ^--' | | :
|
| 145 | * : v | | :
|
| 146 | * uncontended : (n,x,y) +--> (n,0,0) --' | :
|
| 147 | * queue : | ^--' | :
|
| 148 | * : v | :
|
| 149 | * contended : (*,x,y) +--> (*,0,0) ---> (*,0,1) -' :
|
| 150 | * queue : ^--' :
|
| 151 |
|
| 152 | void __lockfunc queued_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val)
|
| 153 | {
|
| 154 | struct mcs_spinlock *prev, *next, *node;
|
| 155 | u32 old, tail;
|
| 156 | int idx;
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 | BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS >= (1U << _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS));
|
| 159 |
|
| 160 | if (pv_enabled())
|
| 161 | goto pv_queue;
|
| 162 |
|
| 163 | if (virt_spin_lock(lock))
|
| 164 | return;
|
| 165 |
|
| 166 | |
| 167 | * Wait for in-progress pending->locked hand-overs with a bounded
|
| 168 | * number of spins so that we guarantee forward progress.
|
| 169 | *
|
| 170 | * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1
|
| 171 |
|
| 172 | if (val == _Q_PENDING_VAL) {
|
| 173 | int cnt = _Q_PENDING_LOOPS;
|
| 174 | val = atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&lock->val,
|
| 175 | (VAL != _Q_PENDING_VAL) || !cnt--);
|
| 176 | }
|
| 177 |
|
| 178 | |
| 179 | * If we observe any contention; queue.
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 | if (val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)
|
| 182 | goto queue;
|
| 183 |
|
| 184 | |
| 185 | * trylock || pending
|
| 186 | *
|
| 187 | * 0,0,* -> 0,1,* -> 0,0,1 pending, trylock
|
| 188 |
|
| 189 | val = queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire(lock);
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 | |
| 192 | * If we observe contention, there is a concurrent locker.
|
| 193 | *
|
| 194 | * Undo and queue; our setting of PENDING might have made the
|
| 195 | * n,0,0 -> 0,0,0 transition fail and it will now be waiting
|
| 196 | * on @next to become !NULL.
|
| 197 |
|
| 198 | if (unlikely(val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK)) {
|
| 199 |
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 | if (!(val & _Q_PENDING_MASK))
|
| 202 | clear_pending(lock);
|
| 203 |
|
| 204 | goto queue;
|
| 205 | }
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 | |
| 208 | * We're pending, wait for the owner to go away.
|
| 209 | *
|
| 210 | * 0,1,1 -> *,1,0
|
| 211 | *
|
| 212 | * this wait loop must be a load-acquire such that we match the
|
| 213 | * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
|
| 214 | * sequentiality; this is because not all
|
| 215 | * clear_pending_set_locked() implementations imply full
|
| 216 | * barriers.
|
| 217 |
|
| 218 | if (val & _Q_LOCKED_MASK)
|
| 219 | smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->locked, !VAL);
|
| 220 |
|
| 221 | |
| 222 | * take ownership and clear the pending bit.
|
| 223 | *
|
| 224 | * 0,1,0 -> 0,0,1
|
| 225 |
|
| 226 | clear_pending_set_locked(lock);
|
| 227 | lockevent_inc(lock_pending);
|
| 228 | return;
|
| 229 |
|
| 230 | |
| 231 | * End of pending bit optimistic spinning and beginning of MCS
|
| 232 | * queuing.
|
| 233 |
|
| 234 | queue:
|
| 235 | lockevent_inc(lock_slowpath);
|
| 236 | pv_queue:
|
| 237 | node = this_cpu_ptr(&qnodes[0].mcs);
|
| 238 | idx = node->count++;
|
| 239 | tail = encode_tail(smp_processor_id(), idx);
|
| 240 |
|
| 241 | trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_SPIN);
|
| 242 |
|
| 243 | |
| 244 | * 4 nodes are allocated based on the assumption that there will
|
| 245 | * not be nested NMIs taking spinlocks. That may not be true in
|
| 246 | * some architectures even though the chance of needing more than
|
| 247 | * 4 nodes will still be extremely unlikely. When that happens,
|
| 248 | * we fall back to spinning on the lock directly without using
|
| 249 | * any MCS node. This is not the most elegant solution, but is
|
| 250 | * simple enough.
|
| 251 |
|
| 252 | if (unlikely(idx >= _Q_MAX_NODES)) {
|
| 253 | lockevent_inc(lock_no_node);
|
| 254 | while (!queued_spin_trylock(lock))
|
| 255 | cpu_relax();
|
| 256 | goto release;
|
| 257 | }
|
| 258 |
|
| 259 | node = grab_mcs_node(node, idx);
|
| 260 |
|
| 261 | |
| 262 | * Keep counts of non-zero index values:
|
| 263 |
|
| 264 | lockevent_cond_inc(lock_use_node2 + idx - 1, idx);
|
| 265 |
|
| 266 | |
| 267 | * Ensure that we increment the head node->count before initialising
|
| 268 | * the actual node. If the compiler is kind enough to reorder these
|
| 269 | * stores, then an IRQ could overwrite our assignments.
|
| 270 |
|
| 271 | barrier();
|
| 272 |
|
| 273 | node->locked = 0;
|
| 274 | node->next = NULL;
|
| 275 | pv_init_node(node);
|
| 276 |
|
| 277 | |
| 278 | * We touched a (possibly) cold cacheline in the per-cpu queue node;
|
| 279 | * attempt the trylock once more in the hope someone let go while we
|
| 280 | * weren't watching.
|
| 281 |
|
| 282 | if (queued_spin_trylock(lock))
|
| 283 | goto release;
|
| 284 |
|
| 285 | |
| 286 | * Ensure that the initialisation of @node is complete before we
|
| 287 | * publish the updated tail via xchg_tail() and potentially link
|
| 288 | * @node into the waitqueue via WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node) below.
|
| 289 |
|
| 290 | smp_wmb();
|
| 291 |
|
| 292 | |
| 293 | * Publish the updated tail.
|
| 294 | * We have already touched the queueing cacheline; don't bother with
|
| 295 | * pending stuff.
|
| 296 | *
|
| 297 | * p,*,* -> n,*,*
|
| 298 |
|
| 299 | old = xchg_tail(lock, tail);
|
| 300 | next = NULL;
|
| 301 |
|
| 302 | |
| 303 | * if there was a previous node; link it and wait until reaching the
|
| 304 | * head of the waitqueue.
|
| 305 |
|
| 306 | if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) {
|
| 307 | prev = decode_tail(old, qnodes);
|
| 308 |
|
| 309 |
|
| 310 | WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node);
|
| 311 |
|
| 312 | pv_wait_node(node, prev);
|
| 313 | arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(&node->locked);
|
| 314 |
|
| 315 | |
| 316 | * While waiting for the MCS lock, the next pointer may have
|
| 317 | * been set by another lock waiter. We optimistically load
|
| 318 | * the next pointer & prefetch the cacheline for writing
|
| 319 | * to reduce latency in the upcoming MCS unlock operation.
|
| 320 |
|
| 321 | next = READ_ONCE(node->next);
|
| 322 | if (next)
|
| 323 | prefetchw(next);
|
| 324 | }
|
| 325 |
|
| 326 | |
| 327 | * we're at the head of the waitqueue, wait for the owner & pending to
|
| 328 | * go away.
|
| 329 | *
|
| 330 | * *,x,y -> *,0,0
|
| 331 | *
|
| 332 | * this wait loop must use a load-acquire such that we match the
|
| 333 | * store-release that clears the locked bit and create lock
|
| 334 | * sequentiality; this is because the set_locked() function below
|
| 335 | * does not imply a full barrier.
|
| 336 | *
|
| 337 | * The PV pv_wait_head_or_lock function, if active, will acquire
|
| 338 | * the lock and return a non-zero value. So we have to skip the
|
| 339 | * atomic_cond_read_acquire() call. As the next PV queue head hasn't
|
| 340 | * been designated yet, there is no way for the locked value to become
|
| 341 | * _Q_SLOW_VAL. So both the set_locked() and the
|
| 342 | * atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() calls will be safe.
|
| 343 | *
|
| 344 | * If PV isn't active, 0 will be returned instead.
|
| 345 | *
|
| 346 |
|
| 347 | if ((val = pv_wait_head_or_lock(lock, node)))
|
| 348 | goto locked;
|
| 349 |
|
| 350 | val = atomic_cond_read_acquire(&lock->val, !(VAL & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK));
|
| 351 |
|
| 352 | locked:
|
| 353 | |
| 354 | * claim the lock:
|
| 355 | *
|
| 356 | * n,0,0 -> 0,0,1 : lock, uncontended
|
| 357 | * *,*,0 -> *,*,1 : lock, contended
|
| 358 | *
|
| 359 | * If the queue head is the only one in the queue (lock value == tail)
|
| 360 | * and nobody is pending, clear the tail code and grab the lock.
|
| 361 | * Otherwise, we only need to grab the lock.
|
| 362 |
|
| 363 |
|
| 364 | |
| 365 | * In the PV case we might already have _Q_LOCKED_VAL set, because
|
| 366 | * of lock stealing; therefore we must also allow:
|
| 367 | *
|
| 368 | * n,0,1 -> 0,0,1
|
| 369 | *
|
| 370 | * Note: at this point: (val & _Q_PENDING_MASK) == 0, because of the
|
| 371 | * above wait condition, therefore any concurrent setting of
|
| 372 | * PENDING will make the uncontended transition fail.
|
| 373 |
|
| 374 | if ((val & _Q_TAIL_MASK) == tail) {
|
| 375 | if (atomic_try_cmpxchg_relaxed(&lock->val, &val, _Q_LOCKED_VAL))
|
| 376 | goto release;
|
| 377 | }
|
| 378 |
|
| 379 | |
| 380 | * Either somebody is queued behind us or _Q_PENDING_VAL got set
|
| 381 | * which will then detect the remaining tail and queue behind us
|
| 382 | * ensuring we'll see a @next.
|
| 383 |
|
| 384 | set_locked(lock);
|
| 385 |
|
| 386 | |
| 387 | * contended path; wait for next if not observed yet, release.
|
| 388 |
|
| 389 | if (!next)
|
| 390 | next = smp_cond_load_relaxed(&node->next, (VAL));
|
| 391 |
|
| 392 | arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended(&next->locked);
|
| 393 | pv_kick_node(lock, next);
|
| 394 |
|
| 395 | release:
|
| 396 | trace_contention_end(lock, 0);
|
| 397 |
|
| 398 | |
| 399 | * release the node
|
| 400 |
|
| 401 | __this_cpu_dec(qnodes[0].mcs.count);
|
| 402 | }
|
| 403 | EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
|
| 404 |
|
| 405 | |
| 406 | * Generate the paravirt code for queued_spin_unlock_slowpath().
|
| 407 |
|
| 408 | #if !defined(_GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH) && defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS)
|
| 409 | #define _GEN_PV_LOCK_SLOWPATH
|
| 410 |
|
| 411 | #undef pv_enabled
|
| 412 | #define pv_enabled() true
|
| 413 |
|
| 414 | #undef pv_init_node
|
| 415 | #undef pv_wait_node
|
| 416 | #undef pv_kick_node
|
| 417 | #undef pv_wait_head_or_lock
|
| 418 |
|
| 419 | #undef queued_spin_lock_slowpath
|
| 420 | #define queued_spin_lock_slowpath __pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
|
| 421 |
|
| 422 | #include "qspinlock_paravirt.h"
|
| 423 | #include "qspinlock.c"
|
| 424 |
|
| 425 | bool nopvspin;
|
| 426 | static __init int parse_nopvspin(char *arg)
|
| 427 | {
|
| 428 | nopvspin = true;
|
| 429 | return 0;
|
| 430 | }
|
| 431 | early_param("nopvspin", parse_nopvspin);
|
| 432 | #endif
|